CHDN vs. SBUX
CHDN (Churchill Downs Incorporated) and SBUX (Starbucks Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — CHDN in Gambling, SBUX in Restaurants. Over the past 10 years, CHDN returned 14.99%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for SBUX. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CHDN vs. SBUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHDN achieves a -25.91% return, which is significantly lower than SBUX's 26.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CHDN has outperformed SBUX with an annualized return of 14.99%, while SBUX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.
CHDN
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- 6M
- -14.29%
- YTD
- -25.91%
- 1Y
- -20.46%
- 3Y*
- -10.30%
- 5Y*
- -1.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.09%
SBUX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 15.88%
- YTD
- 26.53%
- 1Y
- 24.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- -0.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $102.86M | $85.15M | $87.04M | |
| $962.07M | $807.87M | $799.68M |
CHDN vs. SBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHDN Churchill Downs Incorporated | -25.91% | -14.47% | -0.74% | 28.06% | -11.95% | 24.05% | 42.47% | 69.49% | 5.47% | 55.74% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 26.53% | -5.26% | -2.48% | -1.19% | -13.18% | 11.15% | 24.19% | 39.09% | 14.74% | 5.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHDN and SBUX is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1993 | 0.28 |
The correlation between CHDN and SBUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CHDN:
$5.88B
SBUX:
$119.99B
CHDN:
$5.79
SBUX:
$1.74
CHDN:
14.55
SBUX:
60.65
CHDN:
1.99
SBUX:
3.14
CHDN:
$2.99B
SBUX:
$38.33B
CHDN:
$604.00M
SBUX:
$12.17B
CHDN:
$1.02B
SBUX:
$5.60B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHDN vs. SBUX — Risk / Return Rank
CHDN
SBUX
CHDN vs. SBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHDN | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.14 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 1.32 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 3.06 | -4.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHDN vs. SBUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHDN drawdown since its inception was -62.86%, smaller than the maximum SBUX drawdown of -81.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHDN and SBUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHDN | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.86% | -81.91% | +19.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.15% | -16.14% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.91% | -31.97% | -11.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.34% | -40.74% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.86% | -43.68% | -19.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.88% | -6.18% | -36.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.66% | -16.21% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.26% | 6.93% | +11.33% |
Volatility
CHDN vs. SBUX - Volatility Comparison
Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) has a higher volatility of 10.76% compared to Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) at 6.41%. This indicates that CHDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHDN | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.76% | 6.41% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.76% | 20.13% | +7.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.71% | 28.42% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.73% | 31.71% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.66% | 29.50% | +8.16% |
Dividends
CHDN vs. SBUX - Dividend Comparison
CHDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SBUX's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHDN Churchill Downs Incorporated | 0.52% | 0.38% | 0.31% | 0.28% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.32% | 0.42% | 0.67% | 0.65% | 0.88% | 0.81% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 2.35% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.25% | 2.02% | 1.57% | 1.57% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.83% | 1.53% | 1.13% |
Financials
CHDN vs. SBUX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Churchill Downs Incorporated and Starbucks Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHDN vs. SBUX - Profitability Comparison
CHDN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Churchill Downs Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 980.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SBUX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.49B and revenue of 9.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.
CHDN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Churchill Downs Incorporated reported an operating income of 357.00M and revenue of 980.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.
SBUX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported an operating income of 980.40M and revenue of 9.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
CHDN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Churchill Downs Incorporated reported a net income of 241.00M and revenue of 980.00M, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.
SBUX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a net income of 1.05B and revenue of 9.32B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHDN and SBUX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHDN has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to SBUX (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHDN dropped -62.86% vs SBUX's -81.91%.
SBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHDN and SBUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer