CHDN vs. SBUX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX).

Performance

CHDN vs. SBUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHDN vs. SBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHDN Churchill Downs Incorporated	-21.05%	-14.47%	-0.74%	28.06%	-11.95%	24.05%	42.47%	69.49%	5.47%	55.74%
SBUX Starbucks Corporation	7.07%	-5.26%	-2.48%	-1.19%	-13.18%	11.15%	24.19%	39.09%	14.74%	5.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CHDN : $6.45B SBUX : $102.30B
EPS CHDN : $5.71 SBUX : $1.20
PE Ratio CHDN : 15.74 SBUX : 74.67
PS Ratio CHDN : 2.20 SBUX : 2.71
Total Revenue (TTM) CHDN : $2.93B SBUX : $37.70B
Gross Profit (TTM) CHDN : $975.40M SBUX : $12.86B
EBITDA (TTM) CHDN : $1.06B SBUX : $4.91B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHDN achieves a -21.05% return, which is significantly lower than SBUX's 7.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CHDN has outperformed SBUX with an annualized return of 14.32%, while SBUX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.13% annualized return.

CHDN

• 1D: 4.62%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: -21.05%
• 6M: -7.04%
• 1Y: -18.81%
• 3Y*: -10.96%
• 5Y*: -4.61%
• 10Y*: 14.32%

SBUX

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -8.60%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: -6.15%
• 3Y*: -2.51%
• 5Y*: -1.68%
• 10Y*: 6.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHDN vs. SBUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHDN

CHDN Risk / Return Rank: 18
CHDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CHDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
CHDN Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CHDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CHDN Martin Ratio Rank: 15

SBUX

SBUX Risk / Return Rank: 32
SBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHDN vs. SBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHDN	SBUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	-0.18	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.55	-0.02	-0.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.00	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	-0.29	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	-0.51	-0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHDN vs. SBUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHDN Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the SBUX Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHDN and SBUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHDN	SBUX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.54	-0.18	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	-0.05	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.21	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.50	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between CHDN and SBUX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CHDN vs. SBUX - Dividend Comparison

CHDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than SBUX's 2.75% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHDN Churchill Downs Incorporated	0.49%	0.38%	0.31%	0.28%	0.34%	0.28%	0.32%	0.42%	0.67%	0.65%	0.88%	0.81%
SBUX Starbucks Corporation	2.75%	2.91%	2.54%	2.25%	2.02%	1.57%	1.57%	1.69%	2.05%	1.83%	1.53%	1.13%

Drawdowns

CHDN vs. SBUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHDN drawdown since its inception was -62.86%, smaller than the maximum SBUX drawdown of -81.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHDN and SBUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHDN	SBUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.86%	-81.91%	+19.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.89%	-19.99%	-8.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.34%	-43.68%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.86%	-43.68%	-19.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.13%	-20.60%	-18.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.44%	-16.28%	-1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.39%	11.27%	+3.12%

Volatility

CHDN vs. SBUX - Volatility Comparison

Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) has a higher volatility of 12.73% compared to Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) at 10.29%. This indicates that CHDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHDN	SBUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.73%	10.29%	+2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.55%	21.53%	+2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.76%	34.43%	+0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.07%	31.33%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.25%	29.30%	+7.95%

Financials

CHDN vs. SBUX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Churchill Downs Incorporated and Starbucks Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CHDN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Churchill Downs Incorporated reported a gross profit of 189.50M and revenue of 665.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.5%.

SBUX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.64B and revenue of 9.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.0%.

CHDN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Churchill Downs Incorporated reported an operating income of 123.50M and revenue of 665.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.

SBUX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported an operating income of 890.80M and revenue of 9.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

CHDN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Churchill Downs Incorporated reported a net income of 77.70M and revenue of 665.90M, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

SBUX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a net income of 293.30M and revenue of 9.92B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.