PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHD vs. BF-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHD vs. BF-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) and Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHD achieves a 14.92% return, which is significantly higher than BF-B's 2.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CHD has outperformed BF-B with an annualized return of 8.07%, while BF-B has yielded a comparatively lower -2.31% annualized return.


CHD

1D
-2.09%
1M
0.13%
6M
4.57%
YTD
14.92%
1Y
0.53%
3Y*
0.38%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
8.07%
ALL TIME*
13.03%

BF-B

1D
-0.45%
1M
-1.31%
6M
-1.57%
YTD
2.70%
1Y
-4.11%
3Y*
-25.57%
5Y*
-16.26%
10Y*
-2.31%
ALL TIME*
12.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHD vs. BF-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
14.92%-18.91%11.96%18.72%-20.41%18.89%25.46%8.36%33.23%15.33%
BF-B
Brown-Forman Corporation
2.70%-29.29%-32.23%-11.91%-8.86%-6.07%18.67%43.78%-10.98%55.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CHD and BF-B is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 1986

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHD:

$22.68B

BF-B:

$12.26B

EPS

CHD:

$3.04

BF-B:

$1.71

PE Ratio

CHD:

31.51

BF-B:

15.40

PEG Ratio

CHD:

3.44

BF-B:

19.14

PS Ratio

CHD:

3.72

BF-B:

3.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHD:

$6.21B

BF-B:

$3.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHD:

$2.80B

BF-B:

$2.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHD:

$1.22B

BF-B:

$1.19B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHD vs. BF-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHD
CHD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BF-B
BF-B Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BF-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BF-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BF-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BF-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BF-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHD vs. BF-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) and Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHDBF-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.02

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

-0.16

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.06

-0.35

+0.41

CHD vs. BF-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the BF-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHD and BF-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHD vs. BF-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHD drawdown since its inception was -51.52%, smaller than the maximum BF-B drawdown of -68.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHD and BF-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHDBF-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.52%

-68.96%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.36%

-25.48%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-65.65%

+38.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.72%

-68.31%

+36.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-68.96%

+37.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.04%

-63.89%

+49.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-11.74%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.19%

11.86%

-2.67%

Volatility

CHD vs. BF-B - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) is 7.63%, while Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B) has a volatility of 10.49%. This indicates that CHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BF-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHDBF-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

10.49%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

31.54%

-14.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.85%

38.70%

-15.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

30.26%

-9.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

28.20%

-6.28%

Dividends

CHD vs. BF-B - Dividend Comparison

CHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than BF-B's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BF-B
Brown-Forman Corporation
3.50%3.49%2.32%1.46%1.17%2.37%0.88%0.99%3.10%1.09%1.54%1.29%
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
1.26%1.41%1.08%1.15%1.30%0.99%1.10%1.29%1.32%1.51%1.61%1.58%

Financials

CHD vs. BF-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Brown-Forman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.47B
1.06B
(CHD) Total Revenue
(BF-B) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHD vs. BF-B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Brown-Forman Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
46.4%
60.6%
Portfolio components
CHD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 681.40M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

BF-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported a gross profit of 640.00M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

CHD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 291.00M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.

BF-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported an operating income of 343.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.5%.

CHD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a net income of 216.30M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

BF-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported a net income of 267.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 25.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHD and BF-B have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BF-B has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to CHD (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHD dropped -51.52% vs BF-B's -68.96%.

CHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHD and BF-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer