PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHCO vs. AVAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHCO vs. AVAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in City Holding Company (CHCO) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHCO achieves a 24.25% return, which is significantly higher than AVAV's -38.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CHCO has underperformed AVAV with an annualized return of 15.33%, while AVAV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.22% annualized return.


CHCO

1D
0.42%
1M
8.31%
6M
19.47%
YTD
24.25%
1Y
23.52%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
17.18%
10Y*
15.33%
ALL TIME*
9.01%

AVAV

1D
1.91%
1M
-21.75%
6M
-46.35%
YTD
-38.25%
1Y
-42.57%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
18.22%
ALL TIME*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$190.78M$258.41M$271.62M
$21.85M$20.27M$17.00M

CHCO vs. AVAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHCO
City Holding Company
24.25%3.38%10.41%21.95%17.28%21.28%-12.17%24.83%2.85%2.46%
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
-38.25%57.18%22.10%47.14%38.09%-28.62%40.75%-9.14%20.99%109.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CHCO and AVAV is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2007

0.32

The correlation between CHCO and AVAV shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHCO:

$2.05B

AVAV:

$7.56B

EPS

CHCO:

$9.10

AVAV:

-$5.41

PS Ratio

CHCO:

5.22

AVAV:

5.17

PB Ratio

CHCO:

2.54

AVAV:

1.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHCO:

$397.90M

AVAV:

$1.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHCO:

$317.02M

AVAV:

$246.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

CHCO:

$169.72M

AVAV:

-$6.04M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHCO vs. AVAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHCO
CHCO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CHCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHCO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CHCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHCO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AVAV
AVAV Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AVAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
AVAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHCO vs. AVAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for City Holding Company (CHCO) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHCOAVAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.93

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

-0.67

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

-1.08

+5.98

CHCO vs. AVAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the AVAV Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHCO and AVAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHCO vs. AVAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHCO drawdown since its inception was -89.14%, which is greater than AVAV's maximum drawdown of -66.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCO and AVAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHCOAVAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.14%

-66.65%

-22.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-66.65%

+57.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-66.65%

+48.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-66.65%

+48.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.25%

-66.65%

+34.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-63.55%

+63.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.58%

-28.94%

+9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

40.94%

-36.40%

Volatility

CHCO vs. AVAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for City Holding Company (CHCO) is 6.18%, while AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has a volatility of 23.79%. This indicates that CHCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHCOAVAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

23.79%

-17.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

59.10%

-46.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.13%

74.38%

-55.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.13%

57.67%

-34.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.58%

52.98%

-26.40%

Dividends

CHCO vs. AVAV - Dividend Comparison

CHCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, while AVAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CHCO
City Holding Company
2.40%2.72%2.48%2.42%2.63%2.84%3.28%2.64%2.83%2.59%2.53%3.64%

Financials

CHCO vs. AVAV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between City Holding Company and AeroVironment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CHCO vs. AVAV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between City Holding Company and AeroVironment, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CHCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, City Holding Company reported a gross profit of 78.65M and revenue of 98.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.9%.

AVAV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 80.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CHCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, City Holding Company reported an operating income of 39.26M and revenue of 98.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 39.9%.

AVAV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.94M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.

CHCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, City Holding Company reported a net income of 31.74M and revenue of 98.40M, resulting in a net margin of 32.3%.

AVAV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a net income of -24.10M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in a net margin of -30.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHCO and AVAV have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVAV has higher volatility (23.79%) compared to CHCO (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHCO dropped -89.14% vs AVAV's -66.65%.

CHCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHCO and AVAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer