PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHCO vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHCO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in City Holding Company (CHCO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHCO achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CHCO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.93%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


CHCO

1D
-1.44%
1M
0.95%
YTD
5.11%
6M
2.05%
1Y
7.20%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
12.93%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHCO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHCO
City Holding Company
5.11%3.38%10.41%21.95%17.28%21.28%-12.17%24.83%2.85%2.46%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CHCO and VOO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between CHCO and VOO has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


City Holding Company

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Return for Risk

CHCO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHCO
CHCO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CHCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHCO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CHCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHCO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHCO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for City Holding Company (CHCO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHCOVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.43

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

3.16

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

14.73

-13.68

CHCO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHCO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHCOVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

2.39

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.83

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.87

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.89

-0.68

Drawdowns

CHCO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHCO drawdown since its inception was -89.14%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCO and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHCOVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.14%

-33.99%

-55.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-8.90%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-18.69%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-24.52%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.25%

-33.99%

+1.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

-0.70%

-4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.67%

-3.69%

-15.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.92%

1.91%

+5.01%

Volatility

CHCO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

City Holding Company (CHCO) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that CHCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHCOVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

2.84%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

8.90%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.67%

11.80%

+7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.20%

16.81%

+6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.65%

18.01%

+8.64%

Dividends

CHCO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CHCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHCO
City Holding Company
2.75%2.72%2.48%2.42%2.63%2.84%3.28%2.64%2.83%2.59%2.53%3.64%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHCO and VOO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHCO has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHCO dropped -89.14% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHCO and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer