CHCLX vs. TAAGX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CHCLX (AB Discovery Growth Fund) and TAAGX (Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CHCLX returned 12.87%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for TAAGX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHCLX charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for TAAGX.

Performance

CHCLX vs. TAAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHCLX achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than TAAGX's 28.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CHCLX has underperformed TAAGX with an annualized return of 12.87%, while TAAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.

CHCLX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -2.69%
• 6M: 4.12%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 1Y: 21.29%
• 3Y*: 13.27%
• 5Y*: 3.03%
• 10Y*: 12.87%

TAAGX

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -6.17%
• 6M: 19.48%
• YTD: 28.73%
• 1Y: 46.36%
• 3Y*: 29.49%
• 5Y*: 15.64%
• 10Y*: 15.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHCLX vs. TAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHCLX AB Discovery Growth Fund	12.26%	6.67%	17.37%	18.72%	-36.11%	11.63%	52.90%	39.99%	-4.56%	32.58%
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund	28.73%	16.01%	36.81%	26.46%	-25.98%	17.90%	36.11%	27.71%	-12.17%	19.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CHCLX and TAAGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2000	0.93

The correlation between CHCLX and TAAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CHCLX vs. TAAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHCLX

CHCLX Risk / Return Rank: 20
CHCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CHCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CHCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CHCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CHCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

TAAGX

TAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 78
TAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
TAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
TAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHCLX vs. TAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) and Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHCLX	TAAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.95	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	2.53	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.32	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	4.91	-3.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.03	15.98	-10.96

CHCLX vs. TAAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHCLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the TAAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHCLX and TAAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHCLX vs. TAAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHCLX drawdown since its inception was -63.85%, roughly equal to the maximum TAAGX drawdown of -62.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCLX and TAAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHCLX	TAAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.85%	-62.13%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.70%	-9.37%	-6.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.36%	-29.24%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.63%	-34.47%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.63%	-34.47%	-10.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.72%	-9.37%	+2.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.15%	-18.62%	+4.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	2.87%	+1.52%

Volatility

CHCLX vs. TAAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) is 7.53%, while Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund (TAAGX) has a volatility of 9.52%. This indicates that CHCLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHCLX	TAAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.53%	9.52%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.58%	19.56%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.15%	23.64%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.03%	23.89%	+2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.04%	22.46%	+2.58%

CHCLX vs. TAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHCLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than TAAGX's 1.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHCLX vs. TAAGX - Dividend Comparison

CHCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.33%, more than TAAGX's 2.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHCLX AB Discovery Growth Fund	10.33%	11.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	17.54%	15.15%	13.36%	20.33%	6.74%	0.00%	6.08%
TAAGX Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund	2.67%	3.44%	17.62%	3.12%	3.06%	8.89%	5.75%	0.00%	7.57%	0.00%	0.00%	15.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHCLX and TAAGX in my portfolio?

CHCLX and TAAGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHCLX or TAAGX?

TAAGX has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to CHCLX (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHCLX dropped -63.85% vs TAAGX's -62.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.