CHCGX vs. BLUEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX).
CHCGX is managed by Chesapeake. It was launched on Sep 29, 1997. BLUEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 10, 1991.
Performance
CHCGX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHCGX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHCGX Chesapeake Growth Fund | -8.39% | 16.21% | 10.98% | 24.70% | -28.72% | 15.48% | 24.23% | 27.99% | -1.74% | 23.65% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -8.68% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 27.86% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CHCGX having a -8.39% return and BLUEX slightly lower at -8.68%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CHCGX having a 9.65% annualized return and BLUEX not far behind at 9.35%.
CHCGX
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -8.39%
- 6M
- -5.88%
- 1Y
- 12.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
BLUEX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -8.68%
- 6M
- -9.03%
- 1Y
- -7.28%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHCGX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHCGX has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHCGX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank
CHCGX
BLUEX
CHCGX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHCGX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | -0.66 | +1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | -0.89 | +2.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.89 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | -0.69 | +1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | -2.40 | +6.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHCGX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | -0.66 | +1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.05 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.57 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.49 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHCGX and BLUEX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CHCGX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison
CHCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, more than BLUEX's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHCGX Chesapeake Growth Fund | 8.36% | 7.65% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
CHCGX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHCGX drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, which is greater than BLUEX's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCGX and BLUEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHCGX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.09% | -54.27% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.44% | -12.19% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | -21.87% | -11.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.28% | -29.06% | -4.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.28% | -10.58% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.50% | -13.39% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 3.51% | -0.01% |
Volatility
CHCGX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison
Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.64%. This indicates that CHCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHCGX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 3.64% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 7.31% | +2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.29% | 11.01% | +7.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 10.50% | +7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 16.57% | +2.19% |