CHAU vs. MULL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL).

CHAU and MULL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHAU is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index (200%). It was launched on Apr 16, 2015. MULL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Nov 11, 2024.

Performance

CHAU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHAU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares	-2.48%	47.73%	-9.77%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	40.10%	558.51%	-40.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAU achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 40.10% return.

CHAU

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -8.47%
• YTD: -2.48%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 47.33%
• 3Y*: 0.30%
• 5Y*: -10.61%
• 10Y*: 2.21%

MULL

• 1D: 18.15%
• 1M: -25.99%
• YTD: 40.10%
• 6M: 196.67%
• 1Y: 845.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

MULL

GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF

CHAU

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares

Return for Risk

CHAU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAU

CHAU Risk / Return Rank: 71
CHAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CHAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CHAU Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CHAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CHAU Martin Ratio Rank: 75

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 98
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHAU	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	6.53	-5.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	3.77	-2.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.50	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	16.69	-14.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	46.83	-38.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHAU vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 6.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAU and MULL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHAU	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	6.53	-5.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	1.91	-2.02

Correlation

The correlation between CHAU and MULL is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CHAU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than MULL's 0.28% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares	2.09%	1.97%	2.25%	3.97%	0.77%	1.73%	0.09%	0.58%	0.83%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.28%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CHAU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAU drawdown since its inception was -79.21%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAU and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAU	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.21%	-72.29%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.99%	-53.09%	+31.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.65%	-39.05%	-21.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.96%	-21.99%	-36.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.47%	18.92%	-13.45%

Volatility

CHAU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) is 9.69%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 47.87%. This indicates that CHAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAU	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.69%	47.87%	-38.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.47%	99.70%	-77.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.74%	130.90%	-94.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.97%	130.06%	-83.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.25%	130.06%	-82.81%