CHAU vs. EDZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CHAU (Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares) and EDZ (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - CHAU tracks the CSI 300 Index (200%) while EDZ tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CHAU returned 5.49%/yr vs -36.99%/yr for EDZ. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. CHAU charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for EDZ.

Performance

CHAU vs. EDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAU achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than EDZ's -56.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CHAU has outperformed EDZ with an annualized return of 5.49%, while EDZ has yielded a comparatively lower -36.99% annualized return.

CHAU

• 1D: -6.92%
• 1M: 2.59%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 6M: 16.43%
• 1Y: 74.53%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: -8.64%
• 10Y*: 5.49%

EDZ

• 1D: 15.00%
• 1M: -15.02%
• YTD: -56.62%
• 6M: -57.41%
• 1Y: -73.55%
• 3Y*: -48.31%
• 5Y*: -25.46%
• 10Y*: -36.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAU vs. EDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares	15.68%	47.73%	6.61%	-28.25%	-49.17%	-2.84%	71.95%	70.01%	-51.03%	74.91%
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	-56.62%	-59.30%	-12.71%	-20.28%	49.27%	-8.69%	-68.79%	-43.01%	32.87%	-64.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAU and EDZ is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015	-0.65

The correlation between CHAU and EDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.67 to -0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHAU vs. EDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHAU	EDZ
Technology	31.1%	14.6%
Financial Services	19.1%	26.2%
Industrials	16.1%	19.7%
Basic Materials	9.4%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	8.0%
Healthcare	4.4%	5.9%
Utilities	3.1%	7.2%
Energy	2.5%	3.9%
Communication Services	0.8%	3.4%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.4%

Return for Risk

CHAU vs. EDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAU

CHAU Risk / Return Rank: 71
CHAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CHAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CHAU Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CHAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CHAU Martin Ratio Rank: 76

EDZ

EDZ Risk / Return Rank: 0
EDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
EDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAU vs. EDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAU	EDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	-1.09	+3.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	-2.23	+4.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.74	+0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.91	-0.98	+5.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.77	-1.75	+15.52

CHAU vs. EDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAU Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the EDZ Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAU and EDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHAU vs. EDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAU drawdown since its inception was -79.21%, smaller than the maximum EDZ drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAU and EDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAU	EDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.21%	-99.99%	+20.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.27%	-74.99%	+59.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.88%	-90.46%	+30.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.59%	-92.91%	+20.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.58%	-99.17%	+20.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.31%	-99.99%	+46.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.86%	-97.73%	+38.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.43%	45.83%	-40.40%

Volatility

CHAU vs. EDZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) is 14.72%, while Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) has a volatility of 36.28%. This indicates that CHAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAU	EDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.72%	36.28%	-21.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.68%	60.77%	-35.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.51%	67.52%	-32.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.32%	58.82%	-11.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.22%	61.46%	-14.24%

CHAU vs. EDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than EDZ's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAU vs. EDZ - Dividend Comparison

CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than EDZ's 10.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares	1.76%	1.97%	2.25%	3.97%	0.77%	1.73%	0.09%	0.58%	0.83%
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares	10.18%	6.58%	4.87%	4.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.82%	1.67%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAU and EDZ in my portfolio?

CHAU and EDZ have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHAU or EDZ?

EDZ has higher volatility (36.28%) compared to CHAU (14.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAU dropped -79.21% vs EDZ's -99.99%.

Which ETF is better, CHAU or EDZ?

On 10-year performance, CHAU leads with 5.49% vs -36.99% for EDZ. On fees, EDZ is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, CHAU has been the lower-risk option at 14.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHAU or EDZ?

Over the 10-year period, CHAU has performed better with a 5.49% return vs -36.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAU or EDZ?

EDZ is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAU or EDZ?

EDZ has the higher dividend yield at 10.18%, compared with 1.76% for CHAU.

What is the main difference between CHAU and EDZ?

CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%), while EDZ tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CHAU and 1.08% for EDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.