CHAT vs. PLTW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW).

CHAT and PLTW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHAT is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on May 17, 2023. PLTW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025.

Performance

CHAT vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHAT vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	4.90%	39.60%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-22.36%	59.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -22.36% return.

CHAT

• 1D: 4.72%
• 1M: -3.19%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 3.42%
• 1Y: 82.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTW

• 1D: 7.69%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: -22.36%
• 6M: -26.84%
• 1Y: 75.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAT vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

PLTW

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF

CHAT

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF

Return for Risk

CHAT vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 61
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAT vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHAT	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	1.10	+1.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	1.72	+1.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.23	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.94	1.47	+3.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.74	3.51	+10.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHAT vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and PLTW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHAT	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	1.10	+1.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.29	+0.98

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and PLTW is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CHAT vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than PLTW's 114.73% yield.

	TTM	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	2.72%	2.85%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	114.73%	72.40%

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -45.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAT	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-45.33%	+13.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.28%	-45.33%	+29.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.73%	-36.49%	+29.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.61%	-16.36%	+10.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.85%	19.06%	-13.21%

Volatility

CHAT vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is 13.21%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 18.41%. This indicates that CHAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAT	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.21%	18.41%	-5.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.24%	45.17%	-21.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.27%	69.45%	-35.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.27%	73.38%	-44.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.27%	73.38%	-44.11%