CHAT vs. PLTW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAT is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHAT returned 68.87% vs -30.37% for PLTW. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

CHAT vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 39.01% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -38.54% return.

CHAT

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -7.69%
• 6M: 32.64%
• YTD: 39.01%
• 1Y: 68.87%
• 3Y*: 40.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 45.20%

PLTW

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -5.95%
• 6M: -21.93%
• YTD: -38.54%
• 1Y: -30.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -15.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	$58.63M	$57.19M	$67.40M
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$2.46M	$2.75M	$3.76M

CHAT vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	39.01%	38.27%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-38.54%	28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and PLTW is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.44

The correlation between CHAT and PLTW shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CHAT vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHAT	PLTW
Technology	78.9%	20.0%
Communication Services	15.2%	-
Industrials	3.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.3%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CHAT vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 66
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 5
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHAT vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAT	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	-0.52	+2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	-0.42	+2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.95	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	-0.56	+2.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.96	-1.02	+8.98

CHAT vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAT	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-57.27%	+25.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.34%	-57.27%	+28.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.25%	-49.73%	+28.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-25.20%	+19.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.01%	31.48%	-23.47%

Volatility

CHAT vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 16.74% compared to PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) at 15.73%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAT	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.74%	15.73%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.39%	48.95%	-14.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.18%	62.54%	-23.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.41%	73.53%	-41.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.41%	73.53%	-41.12%

CHAT vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAT vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than PLTW's 138.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	2.05%	2.85%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	138.40%	72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAT and PLTW in my portfolio?

CHAT and PLTW have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHAT or PLTW?

CHAT has higher volatility (16.74%) compared to PLTW (15.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

Which ETF is better, CHAT or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, CHAT leads with 68.87% vs -30.37% for PLTW. On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PLTW has been the lower-risk option at 15.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHAT or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 68.87% return vs -30.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAT or PLTW?

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAT or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 138.40%, compared with 2.05% for CHAT.

What is the main difference between CHAT and PLTW?

CHAT is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.99% for PLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.