CHAT vs. IGLD

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) and IGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while IGLD is a Gold fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHAT returned 48.02%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for IGLD. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.

Performance

CHAT vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 57.97% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's -3.45% return.

CHAT

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 8.95%
• YTD: 57.97%
• 6M: 60.59%
• 1Y: 113.65%
• 3Y*: 48.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGLD

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -6.93%
• YTD: -3.45%
• 6M: -2.82%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: 20.89%
• 5Y*: 12.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHAT vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	57.97%	49.85%	30.98%	21.04%
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	-3.45%	47.46%	19.36%	1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CHAT and IGLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.17

Return for Risk

CHAT vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 92
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

IGLD

IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 23
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 26
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAT vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHAT	IGLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.34	0.73	+2.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	1.08	+2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.16	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.79	0.80	+5.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.03	2.45	+16.58

CHAT vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAT Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAT and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHAT vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and IGLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHAT	IGLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-21.90%	-9.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.28%	-21.90%	+5.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.34%	-21.90%	-9.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.97%	-19.44%	+9.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-5.31%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.80%	7.12%	-1.32%

Volatility

CHAT vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 7.55%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHAT	IGLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.40%	7.55%	+8.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.00%	22.02%	+5.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.14%	24.13%	+9.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.65%	15.44%	+15.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.65%	15.23%	+15.42%

CHAT vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHAT vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than IGLD's 18.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.80%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	18.87%	9.91%	20.81%	7.85%	4.45%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHAT and IGLD in my portfolio?

CHAT and IGLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHAT or IGLD?

CHAT has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to IGLD (7.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs IGLD's -21.90%.

Which ETF is better, CHAT or IGLD?

On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 48.02% vs 20.89% for IGLD. On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHAT or IGLD?

Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 48.02% return vs 20.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHAT or IGLD?

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHAT or IGLD?

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 18.87%, compared with 1.80% for CHAT.

What is the main difference between CHAT and IGLD?

CHAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while IGLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHAT and 0.85% for IGLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.