CHAT vs. AKAM
CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while AKAM (Akamai Technologies, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CHAT returned 48.02%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for AKAM. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHAT vs. AKAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 57.97% return, which is significantly higher than AKAM's 53.01% return.
CHAT
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 57.97%
- 6M
- 60.59%
- 1Y
- 109.99%
- 3Y*
- 48.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AKAM
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -17.15%
- YTD
- 53.01%
- 6M
- 55.45%
- 1Y
- 70.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
CHAT vs. AKAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 57.97% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 53.01% | -8.78% | -19.18% | 36.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAT and AKAM is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAT vs. AKAM — Risk / Return Rank
CHAT
AKAM
CHAT vs. AKAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHAT | AKAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.30 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.79 | 2.77 | +4.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.03 | 9.09 | +9.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHAT vs. AKAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum AKAM drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and AKAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAT | AKAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -99.80% | +68.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.28% | -25.44% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.34% | -46.84% | +15.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.97% | -59.25% | +49.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -82.59% | +77.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 7.73% | -1.93% |
Volatility
CHAT vs. AKAM - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) at 15.13%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AKAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAT | AKAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.40% | 15.13% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.00% | 47.95% | -19.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.14% | 54.31% | -21.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.65% | 36.61% | -5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.65% | 34.47% | -3.82% |
Dividends
CHAT vs. AKAM - Dividend Comparison
CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while AKAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.80% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAT and AKAM have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to AKAM (15.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs AKAM's -99.80%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHAT and AKAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer