CHASX vs. FNCMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CHASX (Chase Growth Fund) and FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CHASX returned 20.30%/yr vs 19.34%/yr for FNCMX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHASX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FNCMX.

Performance

CHASX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHASX achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly higher than FNCMX's 15.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CHASX having a 20.30% annualized return and FNCMX not far behind at 19.34%.

CHASX

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 6.41%
• YTD: 26.01%
• 6M: 26.13%
• 1Y: 52.42%
• 3Y*: 42.07%
• 5Y*: 22.29%
• 10Y*: 20.30%

FNCMX

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 6.11%
• YTD: 15.79%
• 6M: 14.55%
• 1Y: 38.83%
• 3Y*: 27.53%
• 5Y*: 15.16%
• 10Y*: 19.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHASX vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHASX Chase Growth Fund	26.01%	20.61%	64.71%	25.91%	-20.41%	22.32%	18.27%	42.63%	-3.96%	24.49%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	15.79%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	36.63%	-3.07%	28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CHASX and FNCMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003	0.87

The correlation between CHASX and FNCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CHASX vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHASX

CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 88
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHASX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHASX	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.04	2.43	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	3.19	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.42	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.36	3.03	+2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.07	11.93	+11.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHASX vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHASX Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHASX and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHASX	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.04	2.43	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.11	0.68	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	0.88	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.58	+0.05

Drawdowns

CHASX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHASX drawdown since its inception was -45.94%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHASX and FNCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHASX	FNCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.94%	-55.08%	+9.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.90%	-13.01%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.40%	-24.20%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.63%	-35.64%	+11.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.40%	-35.64%	+5.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-0.88%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.15%	-7.86%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	3.30%	-1.00%

Volatility

CHASX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) at 4.27%. This indicates that CHASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHASX	FNCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	4.27%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.62%	12.14%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.48%	16.25%	+1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.23%	22.46%	-2.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.88%	22.05%	-2.17%

CHASX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHASX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHASX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

CHASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than FNCMX's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHASX Chase Growth Fund	7.24%	9.12%	36.67%	5.80%	5.49%	20.15%	7.83%	22.82%	12.92%	11.92%	9.14%	10.24%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.44%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHASX and FNCMX in my portfolio?

CHASX and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHASX or FNCMX?

CHASX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FNCMX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHASX dropped -45.94% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.