CGY.TO vs. TQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Calian Group Ltd. (CGY.TO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).
TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010.
Performance
CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGY.TO Calian Group Ltd. | 31.95% | 17.68% | -13.77% | -12.54% | 10.48% | -5.19% | 75.46% | 35.41% | -4.85% | 35.99% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | -19.74% | 28.19% | 71.87% | 191.48% | -77.60% | 81.33% | 106.50% | 122.34% | -12.99% | 104.18% |
Different Trading Currencies
CGY.TO is traded in CAD, while TQQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TQQQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGY.TO achieves a 31.95% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -19.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CGY.TO has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 18.06%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 35.72% annualized return.
CGY.TO
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- -9.30%
- YTD
- 31.95%
- 6M
- 48.24%
- 1Y
- 69.45%
- 3Y*
- 6.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 18.06%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 9.88%
- 1M
- -14.03%
- YTD
- -19.74%
- 6M
- -19.20%
- 1Y
- 41.61%
- 3Y*
- 46.48%
- 5Y*
- 15.07%
- 10Y*
- 35.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGY.TO vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
CGY.TO
TQQQ
CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calian Group Ltd. (CGY.TO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGY.TO | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 0.63 | +1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 1.28 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.14 | +1.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.60 | 3.33 | +6.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGY.TO | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 0.63 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.56 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.71 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGY.TO and TQQQ is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
CGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than TQQQ's 0.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGY.TO Calian Group Ltd. | 1.53% | 2.02% | 2.32% | 1.95% | 1.68% | 1.82% | 1.69% | 2.91% | 3.81% | 3.49% | 4.57% | 6.93% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.76% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.59%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -80.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGY.TO and TQQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGY.TO | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.59% | -81.66% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.02% | -36.97% | +11.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.62% | -81.66% | +38.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.62% | -81.66% | +38.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.27% | -30.66% | +17.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.46% | -18.66% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.66% | 12.00% | -4.34% |
Volatility
CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calian Group Ltd. (CGY.TO) is 8.07%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.21%. This indicates that CGY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGY.TO | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 19.21% | -11.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.67% | 37.91% | -10.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.53% | 66.35% | -26.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 64.42% | -34.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.26% | 63.80% | -35.54% |