CGY.TO vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGY.TO (Calian Group Ltd.) is a stock, while TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Over the past 10 years, CGY.TO returned 19.60%/yr vs 46.44%/yr for TQQQ. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Calian Group Ltd. (CGY.TO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CGY.TO is traded in CAD, while TQQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TQQQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGY.TO achieves a 63.36% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 67.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CGY.TO has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 19.60%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 46.44% annualized return.

CGY.TO

• 1D: -1.94%
• 1M: 28.14%
• YTD: 63.36%
• 6M: 60.59%
• 1Y: 128.88%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 12.83%
• 10Y*: 19.60%

TQQQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 36.50%
• YTD: 67.14%
• 6M: 55.88%
• 1Y: 141.82%
• 3Y*: 71.66%
• 5Y*: 32.13%
• 10Y*: 46.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGY.TO Calian Group Ltd.	63.36%	17.68%	-13.77%	-12.54%	10.48%	-5.19%	75.46%	35.41%	-4.85%	35.99%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	66.55%	28.19%	71.87%	191.48%	-77.60%	81.33%	106.50%	122.34%	-12.99%	104.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CGY.TO and TQQQ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010	0.15

Return for Risk

CGY.TO vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGY.TO

CGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
CGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calian Group Ltd. (CGY.TO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGY.TO	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	3.05	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.54	3.18	+1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.42	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.75	3.85	+2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.99	12.05	+5.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGY.TO and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGY.TO	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	3.05	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.50	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.73	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.82	-0.50

Drawdowns

CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.59%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -80.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGY.TO and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGY.TO	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.59%	-80.26%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.20%	-37.06%	+17.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.99%	-57.97%	+18.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.62%	-80.26%	+36.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.62%	-80.26%	+36.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.24%	0.00%	-2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.49%	-17.78%	-3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.19%	11.82%	-4.63%

Volatility

CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Calian Group Ltd. (CGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 20.23% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.04%. This indicates that CGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGY.TO	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.23%	13.04%	+7.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.85%	35.40%	-5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.65%	46.83%	-6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.18%	64.43%	-33.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.13%	63.92%	-34.79%

Dividends

CGY.TO vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGY.TO Calian Group Ltd.	1.24%	2.02%	2.32%	1.95%	1.68%	1.82%	1.69%	2.91%	3.81%	3.49%	4.57%	6.93%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.36%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGY.TO and TQQQ in my portfolio?

CGY.TO and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.