CGY.TO vs. KITS.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calian Group Ltd. (CGY.TO) and Kits Eyecare Ltd. (KITS.TO).

Performance

CGY.TO vs. KITS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Calian Group Ltd. (CGY.TO) and Kits Eyecare Ltd. (KITS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGY.TO vs. KITS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CGY.TO Calian Group Ltd.	31.95%	17.68%	-13.77%	-12.54%	10.48%	-4.31%
KITS.TO Kits Eyecare Ltd.	-14.13%	117.44%	35.10%	132.84%	-7.59%	-68.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CGY.TO : CA$835.06M KITS.TO : CA$536.90M
EPS CGY.TO : CA$2.32 KITS.TO : CA$0.09
PE Ratio CGY.TO : 31.41 KITS.TO : 169.21
PEG Ratio CGY.TO : 1.31 KITS.TO : 0.31
PS Ratio CGY.TO : 1.05 KITS.TO : 2.60
PB Ratio CGY.TO : 2.59 KITS.TO : 8.62
Total Revenue (TTM) CGY.TO : CA$797.06M KITS.TO : CA$202.46M
Gross Profit (TTM) CGY.TO : CA$271.39M KITS.TO : CA$71.72M
EBITDA (TTM) CGY.TO : CA$87.46M KITS.TO : CA$9.42M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGY.TO achieves a 31.95% return, which is significantly higher than KITS.TO's -14.13% return.

CGY.TO

• 1D: 3.69%
• 1M: -9.30%
• YTD: 31.95%
• 6M: 48.24%
• 1Y: 69.45%
• 3Y*: 6.11%
• 5Y*: 7.04%
• 10Y*: 18.06%

KITS.TO

• 1D: 4.72%
• 1M: -10.97%
• YTD: -14.13%
• 6M: -3.08%
• 1Y: 30.51%
• 3Y*: 51.91%
• 5Y*: 13.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CGY.TO vs. KITS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGY.TO

CGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
CGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 88

KITS.TO

KITS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 62
KITS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
KITS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
KITS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
KITS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
KITS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGY.TO vs. KITS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calian Group Ltd. (CGY.TO) and Kits Eyecare Ltd. (KITS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGY.TO	KITS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	0.66	+1.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	1.20	+1.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.16	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	0.91	+2.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.60	2.34	+7.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGY.TO vs. KITS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the KITS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGY.TO and KITS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGY.TO	KITS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.77	0.66	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.28	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.23	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between CGY.TO and KITS.TO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CGY.TO vs. KITS.TO - Dividend Comparison

CGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while KITS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGY.TO Calian Group Ltd.	1.53%	2.02%	2.32%	1.95%	1.68%	1.82%	1.69%	2.91%	3.81%	3.49%	4.57%	6.93%
KITS.TO Kits Eyecare Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CGY.TO vs. KITS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.59%, roughly equal to the maximum KITS.TO drawdown of -78.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGY.TO and KITS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGY.TO	KITS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.59%	-78.07%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.02%	-36.11%	+11.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.62%	-76.04%	+32.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.27%	-28.23%	+14.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.46%	-36.84%	+15.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.66%	13.98%	-6.32%

Volatility

CGY.TO vs. KITS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calian Group Ltd. (CGY.TO) is 8.07%, while Kits Eyecare Ltd. (KITS.TO) has a volatility of 18.75%. This indicates that CGY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KITS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGY.TO	KITS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.07%	18.75%	-10.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.67%	37.08%	-9.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.53%	46.14%	-6.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.58%	50.22%	-20.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.26%	49.80%	-21.54%

Financials

CGY.TO vs. KITS.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Calian Group Ltd. and Kits Eyecare Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CGY.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Calian Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 70.90M and revenue of 208.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.1%.

KITS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kits Eyecare Ltd. reported a gross profit of 18.69M and revenue of 53.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.

CGY.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Calian Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 10.80M and revenue of 208.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.

KITS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kits Eyecare Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.22M and revenue of 53.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.

CGY.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Calian Group Ltd. reported a net income of 5.10M and revenue of 208.00M, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.

KITS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kits Eyecare Ltd. reported a net income of 264.00K and revenue of 53.89M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.