CGXF.TO vs. GDMN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN).

CGXF.TO and GDMN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGXF.TO is an actively managed fund by CI. It was launched on Mar 3, 2022. GDMN is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Dec 16, 2021.

Performance

CGXF.TO vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGXF.TO vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common	6.89%	114.19%	11.88%	1.43%	1.89%	3.86%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	10.24%	221.63%	39.25%	10.48%	-8.54%	4.04%

Different Trading Currencies

CGXF.TO is traded in CAD, while GDMN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDMN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXF.TO achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly lower than GDMN's 10.24% return.

CGXF.TO

• 1D: 6.44%
• 1M: -17.38%
• YTD: 6.89%
• 6M: 18.28%
• 1Y: 70.32%
• 3Y*: 34.03%
• 5Y*: 21.17%
• 10Y*: 13.49%

GDMN

• 1D: 9.26%
• 1M: -26.30%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 6M: 31.51%
• 1Y: 132.14%
• 3Y*: 66.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGXF.TO vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXF.TO has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

CGXF.TO

CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common

GDMN

WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund

Return for Risk

CGXF.TO vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGXF.TO

CGXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
CGXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CGXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CGXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CGXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CGXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 91
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGXF.TO vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGXF.TO	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.15	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.31	-0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	3.54	-0.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.78	12.23	-2.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGXF.TO vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGXF.TO and GDMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGXF.TO	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	2.15	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	1.06	-1.00

Correlation

The correlation between CGXF.TO and GDMN is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CGXF.TO vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

CGXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.53%, more than GDMN's 2.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common	9.53%	7.43%	8.09%	8.92%	8.54%	8.59%	11.01%	6.69%	7.97%	6.99%	10.68%	11.75%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	2.48%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CGXF.TO vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -49.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXF.TO and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGXF.TO	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.66%	-52.82%	-35.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.39%	-39.03%	+11.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.38%	-28.60%	+11.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.85%	-18.45%	-12.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.40%	11.39%	-3.99%

Volatility

CGXF.TO vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) is 16.05%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 24.65%. This indicates that CGXF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGXF.TO	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.05%	24.65%	-8.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.80%	52.72%	-19.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.76%	61.94%	-22.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.17%	44.69%	-14.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.09%	44.69%	-14.60%