PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGUS vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGUS vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGUS vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
-3.62%16.21%24.89%27.72%-7.94%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
-3.70%17.46%24.88%26.84%-10.30%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CGUS having a -3.62% return and SCHX slightly lower at -3.70%.


CGUS

1D
0.68%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
-3.62%
6M
-2.23%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHX

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-3.70%
6M
-1.70%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGUS vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGUS vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGUS
CGUS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGUS vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGUSSCHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

0.98

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

1.50

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.51

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.47

7.02

-0.55

CGUS vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGUS and SCHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGUSSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

0.98

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.80

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between CGUS and SCHX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGUS vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

CGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SCHX's 1.16% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
0.99%0.95%1.02%1.22%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.16%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Drawdowns

CGUS vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUS drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUS and SCHX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGUSSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.86%

-34.33%

+12.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-12.19%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.10%

-5.67%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-4.00%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.62%

0.00%

Volatility

CGUS vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 5.36%. This indicates that CGUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGUSSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

5.36%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

9.67%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

18.33%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

17.13%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

18.13%

-1.58%