CGUS vs. SCHK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CGUS (Capital Group Core Equity ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CGUS is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGUS returned 21.44%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for SCHK. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CGUS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.

Performance

CGUS vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CGUS having a 8.46% return and SCHK slightly higher at 8.54%.

CGUS

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 22.50%
• 3Y*: 21.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHK

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 20.74%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGUS vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	8.46%	16.21%	24.89%	27.72%	-4.78%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	8.54%	17.23%	24.48%	26.63%	-8.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CGUS and SCHK is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.97

The correlation between CGUS and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGUS vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGUS	SCHK
Technology	40.7%	38.0%
Communication Services	10.6%	10.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	9.8%
Financial Services	9.2%	11.2%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.4%
Industrials	8.4%	8.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	4.3%
Basic Materials	2.3%	1.9%
Utilities	1.8%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.4%	2.0%

Return for Risk

CGUS vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGUS

CGUS Risk / Return Rank: 54
CGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 52
CGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SCHK

SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 58
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGUS vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGUS	SCHK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.86	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.53	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	2.65	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.74	11.81	-1.08

CGUS vs. SCHK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SCHK Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGUS and SCHK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGUS vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUS drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUS and SCHK.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGUS	SCHK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-34.80%	+12.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-8.97%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-19.21%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.07%	-2.98%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-5.16%	+0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.01%	+0.09%

Volatility

CGUS vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) have volatilities of 4.95% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGUS	SCHK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	4.96%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.35%	10.10%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	12.84%	+0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	17.34%	-0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	19.12%	-2.61%

CGUS vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGUS vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison

CGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	0.88%	0.95%	1.02%	1.22%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.20%	1.38%	1.57%	1.17%	1.58%	1.82%	1.80%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGUS and SCHK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, CGUS and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CGUS or SCHK?

SCHK has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to CGUS (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUS dropped -21.86% vs SCHK's -34.80%.

Which ETF is better, CGUS or SCHK?

On 3-year performance, CGUS leads with 21.44% vs 20.74% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGUS or SCHK?

Over the 3-year period, CGUS has performed better with a 21.44% return vs 20.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGUS or SCHK?

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGUS or SCHK?

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.88% for CGUS.

What is the main difference between CGUS and SCHK?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGUS and 0.03% for SCHK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.