PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGUS vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGUS vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGUS achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.28% return.


CGUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
3.74%
YTD
9.93%
6M
10.08%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHB

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGUS vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
9.93%16.21%24.89%27.72%-7.94%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.28%16.94%23.93%26.16%-10.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CGUS and SCHB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.97

The correlation between CGUS and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGUS vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGUS
SCHB

Technology

38.4%
34.4%

Financial Services

10.8%
12.2%

Communication Services

9.9%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.1%

Industrials

9.6%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.9%

Energy

3.7%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.6%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.4%

Utilities

1.7%
2.3%

Technology

CGUS
38.4%
SCHB
34.4%

Financial Services

CGUS
10.8%
SCHB
12.2%

Communication Services

CGUS
9.9%
SCHB
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CGUS
9.8%
SCHB
10.1%

Industrials

CGUS
9.6%
SCHB
9.4%

Healthcare

CGUS
8.3%
SCHB
8.9%

Energy

CGUS
3.7%
SCHB
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

CGUS
3.3%
SCHB
4.6%

Basic Materials

CGUS
2.5%
SCHB
2.0%

Real Estate

CGUS
2.1%
SCHB
2.4%

Utilities

CGUS
1.7%
SCHB
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGUS vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGUS
CGUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGUS vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGUSSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

3.17

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.44

14.55

-2.11

CGUS vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGUS and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGUSSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.33

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.83

+0.14

Drawdowns

CGUS vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUS drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUS and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGUSSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.86%

-35.27%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.59%

-8.91%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-19.34%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.72%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-4.12%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.94%

+0.12%

Volatility

CGUS vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) have volatilities of 2.89% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGUSSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

3.01%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

9.14%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

12.12%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

17.24%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

18.32%

-1.94%

CGUS vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGUS vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

CGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
0.87%0.95%1.02%1.22%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, CGUS and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHB has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to CGUS (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUS dropped -21.86% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 3-year performance, CGUS leads with 22.34% vs 22.11% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, CGUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGUS has performed better with a 22.34% return vs 22.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGUS.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.87% for CGUS.

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGUS and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGUS and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer