CGUS vs. PSEP
CGUS (Capital Group Core Equity ETF) and PSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September) are both exchange-traded funds - CGUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while PSEP is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. CGUS is actively managed, while PSEP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGUS returned 22.34%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for PSEP. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGUS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PSEP.
Performance
CGUS vs. PSEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGUS achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than PSEP's 4.91% return.
CGUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSEP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- —
CGUS vs. PSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF | 9.93% | 16.21% | 24.89% | 27.72% | -7.94% |
PSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September | 4.91% | 11.85% | 12.44% | 18.84% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGUS and PSEP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between CGUS and PSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
CGUS vs. PSEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGUS
PSEP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
CGUS
PSEP
Financial Services
CGUS
PSEP
Communication Services
CGUS
PSEP
Consumer Cyclical
CGUS
PSEP
Industrials
CGUS
PSEP
Healthcare
CGUS
PSEP
Energy
CGUS
PSEP
Consumer Defensive
CGUS
PSEP
Basic Materials
CGUS
PSEP
Real Estate
CGUS
PSEP
Utilities
CGUS
PSEP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGUS vs. PSEP — Risk / Return Rank
CGUS
PSEP
CGUS vs. PSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGUS | PSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.08 | 2.59 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 3.83 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.53 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 3.62 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.44 | 19.15 | -6.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGUS | PSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.59 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.96 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
CGUS vs. PSEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGUS drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, which is greater than PSEP's maximum drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUS and PSEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGUS | PSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.86% | -17.90% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -4.08% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -9.92% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.08% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -1.56% | -3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 0.77% | +1.29% |
Volatility
CGUS vs. PSEP - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) at 0.70%. This indicates that CGUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGUS | PSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 0.70% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 4.25% | +5.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 5.71% | +6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 8.61% | +7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 10.12% | +6.26% |
CGUS vs. PSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGUS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than PSEP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGUS vs. PSEP - Dividend Comparison
CGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while PSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF | 0.87% | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.10% |
PSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, CGUS and PSEP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CGUS has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to PSEP (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUS dropped -21.86% vs PSEP's -17.90%.
On 3-year performance, CGUS leads with 22.34% vs 13.16% for PSEP. On fees, CGUS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, PSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGUS has performed better with a 22.34% return vs 13.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGUS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PSEP.
CGUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for PSEP.
CGUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSEP is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGUS and 0.79% for PSEP.
PSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGUS and PSEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer