CGUS vs. CGIC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CGUS (Capital Group Core Equity ETF) and CGIC (Capital Group International Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGIC is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGUS returned 22.06% vs 28.04% for CGIC. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CGUS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for CGIC.

Performance

CGUS vs. CGIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGUS achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than CGIC's 12.31% return.

CGUS

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 2.67%
• 6M: 10.76%
• YTD: 13.18%
• 1Y: 22.06%
• 3Y*: 21.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.87%

CGIC

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 4.95%
• YTD: 12.31%
• 1Y: 28.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	$27.47M	$22.42M	$22.07M
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	$56.62M	$48.62M	$48.21M

CGUS vs. CGIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	13.18%	16.21%	8.99%
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	12.31%	37.53%	-3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CGUS and CGIC is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024	0.72

The correlation between CGUS and CGIC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGUS vs. CGIC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGUS	CGIC
Technology	40.4%	22.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	6.8%
Communication Services	9.7%	6.9%
Healthcare	9.4%	4.6%
Financial Services	9.3%	20.0%
Industrials	9.2%	14.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	7.7%
Energy	2.8%	4.8%
Basic Materials	2.4%	7.5%
Utilities	1.9%	3.6%
Real Estate	1.4%	1.7%

Return for Risk

CGUS vs. CGIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGUS

CGUS Risk / Return Rank: 70
CGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
CGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 78

CGIC

CGIC Risk / Return Rank: 71
CGIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CGIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CGIC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CGIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
CGIC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGUS vs. CGIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGUS	CGIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.69	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	2.34	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	2.49	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.37	9.18	+1.19

CGUS vs. CGIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the CGIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGUS and CGIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGUS vs. CGIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUS drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, which is greater than CGIC's maximum drawdown of -13.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUS and CGIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGUS	CGIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-13.10%	-8.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-11.30%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.68%	+1.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-2.52%	-2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	3.06%	-0.93%

Volatility

CGUS vs. CGIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) is 3.89%, while Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that CGUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGUS	CGIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	5.19%	-1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.63%	14.77%	-4.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.35%	16.74%	-3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.43%	16.58%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.43%	16.58%	-0.15%

CGUS vs. CGIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CGIC's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGUS vs. CGIC - Dividend Comparison

CGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than CGIC's 1.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF	1.68%	1.60%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	0.82%	0.95%	1.02%	1.22%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGUS and CGIC in my portfolio?

CGUS and CGIC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGUS or CGIC?

CGIC has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to CGUS (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUS dropped -21.86% vs CGIC's -13.10%.

Which ETF is better, CGUS or CGIC?

On 1-year performance, CGIC leads with 28.04% vs 22.06% for CGUS. On fees, CGUS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGUS or CGIC?

Over the 1-year period, CGIC has performed better with a 28.04% return vs 22.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGUS or CGIC?

CGUS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGIC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGUS or CGIC?

CGIC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.82% for CGUS.

What is the main difference between CGUS and CGIC?

CGUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CGIC is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGUS and 0.54% for CGIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.