CGUS vs. CGGO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CGUS (Capital Group Core Equity ETF) and CGGO (Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGGO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGUS returned 21.44%/yr vs 21.20%/yr for CGGO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGUS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for CGGO.

Performance

CGUS vs. CGGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGUS achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than CGGO's 17.98% return.

CGUS

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 22.50%
• 3Y*: 21.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGGO

• 1D: -4.02%
• 1M: 3.86%
• YTD: 17.98%
• 6M: 17.46%
• 1Y: 34.69%
• 3Y*: 21.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGUS vs. CGGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	8.46%	16.21%	24.89%	27.72%	-4.78%
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF	17.98%	21.08%	14.80%	23.43%	-10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CGUS and CGGO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.92

The correlation between CGUS and CGGO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGUS vs. CGGO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGUS	CGGO
Technology	40.7%	40.3%
Communication Services	10.6%	7.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	9.2%
Financial Services	9.2%	9.7%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.6%
Industrials	8.4%	13.6%
Energy	3.5%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	4.0%
Basic Materials	2.3%	3.2%
Utilities	1.8%	0.8%
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

CGUS vs. CGGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGUS

CGUS Risk / Return Rank: 54
CGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 52
CGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 62

CGGO

CGGO Risk / Return Rank: 59
CGGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
CGGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CGGO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CGGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CGGO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGUS vs. CGGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) and Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGUS	CGGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.85	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.50	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.34	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	2.65	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.74	11.66	-0.93

CGUS vs. CGGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the CGGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGUS and CGGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGUS vs. CGGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGUS drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum CGGO drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGUS and CGGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGUS	CGGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-24.90%	+3.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-13.15%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-17.93%	-0.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.07%	-4.02%	+1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-5.46%	+0.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.98%	-0.88%

Volatility

CGUS vs. CGGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) is 4.95%, while Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) has a volatility of 9.82%. This indicates that CGUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGUS	CGGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	9.82%	-4.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.35%	16.81%	-6.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	18.89%	-5.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	18.99%	-2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	18.99%	-2.48%

CGUS vs. CGGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGUS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CGGO's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGUS vs. CGGO - Dividend Comparison

CGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than CGGO's 1.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGGO Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF	1.72%	2.03%	1.10%	0.76%	0.59%
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	0.88%	0.95%	1.02%	1.22%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGUS and CGGO in my portfolio?

CGUS and CGGO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGUS or CGGO?

CGGO has higher volatility (9.82%) compared to CGUS (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGUS dropped -21.86% vs CGGO's -24.90%.

Which ETF is better, CGUS or CGGO?

On 3-year performance, CGUS leads with 21.44% vs 21.20% for CGGO. On fees, CGUS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGUS or CGGO?

Over the 3-year period, CGUS has performed better with a 21.44% return vs 21.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGUS or CGGO?

CGUS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGUS or CGGO?

CGGO has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.88% for CGUS.

What is the main difference between CGUS and CGGO?

CGUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CGGO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGUS and 0.47% for CGGO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.