CGSM vs. TAXS
CGSM (Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF) and TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. CGSM is actively managed, while TAXS is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGSM charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXS.
Performance
CGSM vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGSM achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than TAXS's 0.99% return.
CGSM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAXS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGSM vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGSM Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 1.37% | 1.67% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.99% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGSM and TAXS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGSM vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank
CGSM
TAXS
CGSM vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGSM | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGSM | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.89 | 2.85 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
CGSM vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGSM drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSM and TAXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGSM | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -0.84% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.03% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -0.24% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility
CGSM vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGSM | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33% | 1.00% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.79% | 1.00% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.79% | 1.00% | +0.79% |
CGSM vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGSM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CGSM vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison
CGSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than TAXS's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGSM Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF | 2.99% | 3.05% | 3.11% | 0.84% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.82% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGSM and TAXS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CGSM.
CGSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 1.82% for TAXS.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CGSM and 0.05% for TAXS.
Find the right allocation for CGSM and TAXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer