CGSD vs. LONZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ).

CGSD and LONZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGSD is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Oct 25, 2022. LONZ is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022.

Performance

CGSD vs. LONZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGSD vs. LONZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF	0.21%	6.11%	5.46%	5.03%	1.32%
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	-0.25%	5.05%	9.85%	12.56%	1.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGSD achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly higher than LONZ's -0.25% return.

CGSD

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.52%
• YTD: 0.21%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 4.52%
• 3Y*: 5.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LONZ

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: -0.25%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: 8.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGSD vs. LONZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGSD has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LONZ's 0.62% expense ratio.

LONZ

PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund

CGSD

Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF

Return for Risk

CGSD vs. LONZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGSD

CGSD Risk / Return Rank: 96
CGSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CGSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CGSD Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CGSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CGSD Martin Ratio Rank: 97

LONZ

LONZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
LONZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
LONZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LONZ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
LONZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
LONZ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGSD vs. LONZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGSD	LONZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	1.33	+1.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.17	1.56	+2.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.43	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	1.53	+2.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.09	8.28	+10.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGSD vs. LONZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the LONZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGSD and LONZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGSD	LONZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	1.33	+1.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.43	2.24	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between CGSD and LONZ is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CGSD vs. LONZ - Dividend Comparison

CGSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than LONZ's 7.73% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGSD Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF	4.48%	4.48%	4.57%	4.43%	0.64%
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	7.73%	6.60%	8.16%	8.29%	3.33%

Drawdowns

CGSD vs. LONZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGSD drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum LONZ drawdown of -4.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGSD and LONZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGSD	LONZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-4.19%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.11%	-3.38%	+2.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-1.03%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.29%	-0.48%	+0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	0.63%	-0.39%

Volatility

CGSD vs. LONZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF (CGSD) is 0.64%, while PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that CGSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LONZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGSD	LONZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	1.22%	-0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.96%	1.99%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68%	3.97%	-2.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.19%	3.26%	-1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.19%	3.26%	-1.07%