CGRO vs. YCS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CGRO (CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - CGRO is a China Equities fund actively managed by CoreValues, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). CGRO is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, CGRO returned -12.21% vs 23.44% for YCS. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CGRO charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

CGRO vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGRO achieves a -12.97% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 5.42% return.

CGRO

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 12.95%
• 6M: -10.76%
• YTD: -12.97%
• 1Y: -12.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.45%

YCS

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -3.97%
• 6M: 6.17%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: 17.45%
• 5Y*: 23.10%
• 10Y*: 13.35%
• ALL TIME*: 6.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	$6.01K	$9.52K	$35.25K
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	$2.54M	$2.29M	$1.59M

CGRO vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	-12.97%	20.23%	14.75%	1.84%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	5.42%	9.04%	35.41%	-8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CGRO and YCS is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023	-0.11

Return for Risk

CGRO vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGRO

CGRO Risk / Return Rank: 5
CGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 59
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 56
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGRO vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGRO	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	1.43	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	1.85	-2.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.28	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	2.78	-3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	10.25	-10.89

CGRO vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGRO Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGRO and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGRO vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGRO drawdown since its inception was -36.53%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRO and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGRO	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.53%	-49.56%	+13.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.53%	-8.48%	-28.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.62%	-7.32%	-18.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.47%	-19.75%	+8.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.35%	2.29%	+17.06%

Volatility

CGRO vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) have volatilities of 6.15% and 5.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGRO	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	5.95%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.63%	11.87%	+4.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.09%	16.44%	+6.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.67%	21.21%	+7.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.67%	18.61%	+10.06%

CGRO vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGRO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGRO vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

CGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	3.22%	2.48%	2.47%	0.21%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGRO and YCS in my portfolio?

CGRO and YCS have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGRO or YCS?

CGRO has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to YCS (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGRO dropped -36.53% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, CGRO or YCS?

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 23.44% vs -12.21% for CGRO. On fees, CGRO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 5.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGRO or YCS?

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.44% return vs -12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGRO or YCS?

CGRO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGRO or YCS?

CGRO has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between CGRO and YCS?

CGRO is categorized as China Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: CoreValues and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CGRO and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.