CGRE.TO vs. RIT.TO
CGRE.TO (CI Global REIT Private Pool) and RIT.TO (CI Canadian REIT ETF) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGRE.TO returned 4.17%/yr vs 4.01%/yr for RIT.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CGRE.TO vs. RIT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGRE.TO achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than RIT.TO's 12.26% return.
CGRE.TO
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- —
RIT.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 14.42%
- 3Y*
- 9.92%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 6.86%
CGRE.TO vs. RIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRE.TO CI Global REIT Private Pool | 13.75% | 3.39% | 4.66% | 11.66% | -23.63% | 35.03% | 8.96% |
RIT.TO CI Canadian REIT ETF | 12.26% | 11.98% | 2.51% | 5.37% | -20.71% | 34.40% | 16.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGRE.TO and RIT.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGRE.TO vs. RIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGRE.TO
RIT.TO
CGRE.TO vs. RIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global REIT Private Pool (CGRE.TO) and CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGRE.TO | RIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.01 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 5.81 | -0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGRE.TO vs. RIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.28%, smaller than the maximum RIT.TO drawdown of -58.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGRE.TO and RIT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGRE.TO | RIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.28% | -58.76% | +30.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -7.21% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.72% | -17.16% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.28% | -30.73% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.43% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -9.88% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.49% | +0.19% |
Volatility
CGRE.TO vs. RIT.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Global REIT Private Pool (CGRE.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) at 3.14%. This indicates that CGRE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGRE.TO | RIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.14% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 8.25% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 10.77% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 14.69% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 15.46% | -1.06% |
Dividends
CGRE.TO vs. RIT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, which matches RIT.TO's 4.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGRE.TO CI Global REIT Private Pool | 4.46% | 4.95% | 4.88% | 4.86% | 5.16% | 3.77% | 2.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RIT.TO CI Canadian REIT ETF | 4.42% | 4.85% | 5.17% | 5.04% | 5.08% | 3.85% | 4.94% | 4.35% | 5.12% | 5.09% | 5.30% | 4.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGRE.TO and RIT.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and CI Investments.
Find the right allocation for CGRE.TO and RIT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer