PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGNAX vs. FSRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGNAX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio (CGNAX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGNAX achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CGNAX has outperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.49% annualized return.


CGNAX

1D
1.38%
1M
-0.91%
6M
5.05%
YTD
7.56%
1Y
16.03%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
10.37%
ALL TIME*
10.43%

FSRRX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.05%
6M
4.71%
YTD
8.37%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
5.49%
ALL TIME*
4.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CGNAX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGNAX
American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio
7.56%17.85%14.51%18.73%-15.96%16.36%16.31%21.78%-5.88%18.99%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
8.37%10.45%5.84%4.59%-3.34%15.84%3.74%10.48%-3.99%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CGNAX and FSRRX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between CGNAX and FSRRX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGNAX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGNAX
CGNAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CGNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CGNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRRX
FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGNAX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio (CGNAX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGNAXFSRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.57

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

4.14

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

14.82

-7.07

CGNAX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGNAX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGNAX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGNAX drawdown since its inception was -26.56%, smaller than the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGNAX and FSRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGNAXFSRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.56%

-33.42%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-3.42%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.09%

-5.80%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.14%

-12.78%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.56%

-19.93%

-6.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.01%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-4.20%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.95%

+0.95%

Volatility

CGNAX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio (CGNAX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.25%. This indicates that CGNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGNAXFSRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

1.25%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

3.77%

+5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

4.90%

+6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.71%

6.87%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.16%

6.72%

+6.44%

CGNAX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGNAX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGNAX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

CGNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than FSRRX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGNAX
American Funds Growth and Income Portfolio
5.25%5.48%4.79%2.78%6.42%5.11%3.97%5.48%6.06%3.40%4.30%4.51%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
4.58%4.68%4.82%5.29%7.31%5.35%2.25%3.05%9.39%1.57%2.34%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGNAX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGNAX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to FSRRX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGNAX dropped -26.56% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGNAX and FSRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer