CGMM vs. SCHA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CGMM (Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGMM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. CGMM is actively managed, while SCHA is passively managed. Over the past year, CGMM returned 20.81% vs 36.77% for SCHA. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CGMM charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.

Performance

CGMM vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMM achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 20.52% return.

CGMM

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: -0.86%
• 6M: 7.51%
• YTD: 12.62%
• 1Y: 20.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.33%

SCHA

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: -2.12%
• 6M: 12.87%
• YTD: 20.52%
• 1Y: 36.77%
• 3Y*: 16.44%
• 5Y*: 7.93%
• 10Y*: 10.63%
• ALL TIME*: 12.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF	$22.62M	$22.77M	$28.59M
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	$71.21M	$80.95M	$78.39M

CGMM vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF	12.62%	12.15%
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	20.52%	9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CGMM and SCHA is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025	0.93

The correlation between CGMM and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGMM vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGMM	SCHA
Industrials	21.7%	14.6%
Technology	18.7%	21.0%
Financial Services	16.2%	16.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	9.2%
Healthcare	11.7%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	2.5%
Utilities	3.0%	2.2%
Basic Materials	3.0%	4.5%
Energy	2.7%	4.9%
Real Estate	2.6%	6.5%
Communication Services	2.4%	2.5%

Return for Risk

CGMM vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGMM

CGMM Risk / Return Rank: 54
CGMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CGMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CGMM Omega Ratio Rank: 47
CGMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CGMM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SCHA

SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 83
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGMM vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CGMM	SCHA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.92	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.75	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	3.89	-1.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.78	12.34	-4.56

CGMM vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMM and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CGMM vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMM drawdown since its inception was -21.04%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMM and SCHA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGMM	SCHA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.04%	-42.41%	+21.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.09%	-9.50%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.79%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	-5.40%	+3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.07%	-7.54%	+4.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	2.99%	-0.31%

Volatility

CGMM vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) is 3.95%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that CGMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGMM	SCHA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	5.82%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.03%	14.75%	-2.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.01%	19.27%	-3.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.77%	22.08%	-2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.77%	22.78%	-3.01%

CGMM vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGMM vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

CGMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than SCHA's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF	0.38%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	1.05%	1.26%	1.51%	1.42%	1.37%	1.19%	1.05%	1.39%	1.58%	1.24%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGMM and SCHA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, CGMM and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CGMM or SCHA?

SCHA has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to CGMM (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGMM dropped -21.04% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

Which ETF is better, CGMM or SCHA?

On 1-year performance, SCHA leads with 36.77% vs 20.81% for CGMM. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CGMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGMM or SCHA?

Over the 1-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 36.77% return vs 20.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGMM or SCHA?

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for CGMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGMM or SCHA?

SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.38% for CGMM.

What is the main difference between CGMM and SCHA?

CGMM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for CGMM and 0.04% for SCHA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.