CGJIX vs. CSIBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CGJIX (Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund) and CSIBX (Calvert Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - CGJIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Calvert Research and Management, while CSIBX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Calvert Research and Management. Over the past 10 years, CGJIX returned 17.80%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for CSIBX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGJIX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for CSIBX.

Performance

CGJIX vs. CSIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) and Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGJIX achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than CSIBX's 0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CGJIX has outperformed CSIBX with an annualized return of 17.80%, while CSIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.

CGJIX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 6.98%
• YTD: 12.35%
• 6M: 11.64%
• 1Y: 28.82%
• 3Y*: 23.19%
• 5Y*: 14.53%
• 10Y*: 17.80%

CSIBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 6M: 0.25%
• 1Y: 5.60%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: 0.73%
• 10Y*: 2.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGJIX vs. CSIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund	12.35%	14.56%	27.74%	36.66%	-26.84%	26.13%	38.69%	35.29%	0.74%	27.39%
CSIBX Calvert Bond Fund	0.23%	7.93%	2.45%	6.55%	-12.85%	0.11%	7.39%	8.44%	-0.16%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CGJIX and CSIBX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.04

Over the past year, CGJIX and CSIBX have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CGJIX vs. CSIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGJIX

CGJIX Risk / Return Rank: 53
CGJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CGJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
CGJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CGJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CGJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CSIBX

CSIBX Risk / Return Rank: 23
CSIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CSIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CSIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CSIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CSIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGJIX vs. CSIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) and Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGJIX	CSIBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.42	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.11	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.25	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	1.79	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.47	5.45	+6.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGJIX vs. CSIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGJIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the CSIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGJIX and CSIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGJIX	CSIBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	1.42	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.13	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.49	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	1.04	-0.17

Drawdowns

CGJIX vs. CSIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGJIX drawdown since its inception was -31.18%, which is greater than CSIBX's maximum drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGJIX and CSIBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGJIX	CSIBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.18%	-17.57%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.15%	-3.14%	-8.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	-5.95%	-15.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.18%	-17.57%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.18%	-17.57%	-13.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.52%	+1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.46%	-2.05%	-3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	1.03%	+1.57%

Volatility

CGJIX vs. CSIBX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Calvert Bond Fund (CSIBX) at 1.49%. This indicates that CGJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGJIX	CSIBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	1.49%	+1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.41%	2.95%	+7.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.49%	3.97%	+9.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.79%	5.50%	+14.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.04%	4.55%	+15.49%

CGJIX vs. CSIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGJIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CSIBX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGJIX vs. CSIBX - Dividend Comparison

CGJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than CSIBX's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund	2.71%	3.05%	2.04%	0.53%	0.51%	1.85%	1.76%	1.64%	5.72%	2.19%	1.13%	0.00%
CSIBX Calvert Bond Fund	4.31%	4.35%	4.18%	3.28%	2.34%	3.12%	3.39%	3.43%	2.49%	2.22%	2.58%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGJIX and CSIBX in my portfolio?

CGJIX and CSIBX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGJIX or CSIBX?

CGJIX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to CSIBX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGJIX dropped -31.18% vs CSIBX's -17.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.