PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGJIX vs. CFJIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGJIX vs. CFJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGJIX achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than CFJIX's 15.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CGJIX has outperformed CFJIX with an annualized return of 17.80%, while CFJIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.84% annualized return.


CGJIX

1D
0.13%
1M
6.98%
YTD
12.35%
6M
11.64%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
14.53%
10Y*
17.80%

CFJIX

1D
0.89%
1M
5.68%
YTD
15.07%
6M
16.33%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGJIX vs. CFJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
12.35%14.56%27.74%36.66%-26.84%26.13%38.69%35.29%0.74%27.39%
CFJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund
15.07%16.76%14.63%9.86%-11.70%24.40%9.06%29.36%-10.08%15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CGJIX and CFJIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.72

The correlation between CGJIX and CFJIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGJIX vs. CFJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGJIX
CGJIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CGJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CGJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CFJIX
CFJIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CFJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CFJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGJIX vs. CFJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGJIXCFJIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.44

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

13.35

-1.88

CGJIX vs. CFJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGJIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the CFJIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGJIX and CFJIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGJIXCFJIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.44

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.59

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.66

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.67

+0.21

Drawdowns

CGJIX vs. CFJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGJIX drawdown since its inception was -31.18%, smaller than the maximum CFJIX drawdown of -36.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGJIX and CFJIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGJIXCFJIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.18%

-36.91%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-9.00%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-16.60%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.18%

-22.62%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.18%

-36.91%

+5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-5.10%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.31%

+0.29%

Volatility

CGJIX vs. CFJIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) is 3.38%, while Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that CGJIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGJIXCFJIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.91%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

9.60%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

12.70%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

15.97%

+3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

17.99%

+2.05%

CGJIX vs. CFJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CGJIX and CFJIX have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CGJIX vs. CFJIX - Dividend Comparison

CGJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than CFJIX's 7.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CFJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund
7.96%9.16%6.31%2.07%2.02%4.17%1.88%2.17%4.87%6.79%2.28%
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
2.71%3.05%2.04%0.53%0.51%1.85%1.76%1.64%5.72%2.19%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGJIX and CFJIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFJIX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to CGJIX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGJIX dropped -31.18% vs CFJIX's -36.91%.

CFJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGJIX and CFJIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer