PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGIE vs. CGCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGIE vs. CGCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) and Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIE achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly higher than CGCP's 0.47% return.


CGIE

1D
0.96%
1M
3.34%
YTD
5.63%
6M
6.80%
1Y
13.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGCP

1D
0.13%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.72%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIE vs. CGCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGIE
Capital Group International Equity ETF
5.63%28.11%0.72%11.14%
CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
0.47%7.35%2.95%7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CGIE and CGCP is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023

0.37

CGIE vs. CGCP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGIE
CGCP

Industrials

28.1%

-

Financial Services

20.1%

-

Technology

17.8%

-

Healthcare

7.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.0%

-

Utilities

6.8%

-

Basic Materials

4.1%

-

Energy

3.8%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Real Estate

-

97.3%

Industrials

CGIE
28.1%
CGCP

-

Financial Services

CGIE
20.1%
CGCP

-

Technology

CGIE
17.8%
CGCP

-

Healthcare

CGIE
7.5%
CGCP

-

Consumer Defensive

CGIE
7.0%
CGCP

-

Utilities

CGIE
6.8%
CGCP

-

Basic Materials

CGIE
4.1%
CGCP

-

Energy

CGIE
3.8%
CGCP
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CGIE
2.7%
CGCP

-

Communication Services

CGIE
2.2%
CGCP

-

Real Estate

CGIE

-

CGCP
97.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGIE vs. CGCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIE
CGIE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CGIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGIE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CGIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGIE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

CGCP
CGCP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CGCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCP Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCP Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIE vs. CGCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) and Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGIECGCPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.26

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.06

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.37

6.78

-2.41

CGIE vs. CGCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIE Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the CGCP Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIE and CGCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGIECGCPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.46

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.26

+0.82

Drawdowns

CGIE vs. CGCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIE drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum CGCP drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIE and CGCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGIECGCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-15.06%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-2.59%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-1.03%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-4.92%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

0.79%

+2.40%

Volatility

CGIE vs. CGCP - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) at 1.33%. This indicates that CGIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGIECGCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

1.33%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.58%

2.73%

+10.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.04%

3.70%

+12.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

6.35%

+9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

6.35%

+9.17%

CGIE vs. CGCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIE has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than CGCP's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGIE vs. CGCP - Dividend Comparison

CGIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than CGCP's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CGCP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
5.15%5.10%5.17%4.98%2.96%
CGIE
Capital Group International Equity ETF
1.10%1.17%1.27%0.19%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGIE and CGCP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGIE has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to CGCP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIE dropped -13.82% vs CGCP's -15.06%.

On 1-year performance, CGIE leads with 13.91% vs 5.31% for CGCP. On fees, CGCP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, CGCP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGIE has performed better with a 13.91% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGCP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGIE.

CGCP has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 1.10% for CGIE.

CGIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CGCP is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGIE and 0.34% for CGCP.

CGCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGIE and CGCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer