CGIC vs. IFLO
CGIC (Capital Group International Core Equity ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, CGIC returned 28.18% vs 32.28% for IFLO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGIC charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
CGIC vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGIC achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.
CGIC
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGIC vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF | 11.95% | 14.50% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 16.93% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGIC and IFLO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.85 |
CGIC vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGIC
IFLO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
CGIC
IFLO
Technology
CGIC
IFLO
Industrials
CGIC
IFLO
Basic Materials
CGIC
IFLO
Consumer Defensive
CGIC
IFLO
Consumer Cyclical
CGIC
IFLO
Communication Services
CGIC
IFLO
Energy
CGIC
IFLO
Healthcare
CGIC
IFLO
Utilities
CGIC
IFLO
Real Estate
CGIC
IFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGIC vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
CGIC
IFLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CGIC vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGIC | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGIC vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGIC drawdown since its inception was -13.10%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIC and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGIC | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.10% | -6.44% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -6.44% | -4.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -3.37% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -1.25% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility
CGIC vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGIC | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 14.75% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 14.75% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 14.75% | +1.77% |
CGIC vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGIC has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGIC vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
CGIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than IFLO's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CGIC Capital Group International Core Equity ETF | 1.33% | 1.60% | 0.68% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.51% | 0.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGIC and IFLO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 28.18% for CGIC. On fees, CGIC is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 28.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGIC is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.
IFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.33% for CGIC.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CGIC and 0.56% for IFLO.
Find the right allocation for CGIC and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer