PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGIC vs. CGIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGIC vs. CGIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIC achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly higher than CGIE's 4.62% return.


CGIC

1D
-1.04%
1M
5.13%
YTD
12.85%
6M
15.39%
1Y
30.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGIE

1D
-0.74%
1M
3.82%
YTD
4.62%
6M
6.00%
1Y
13.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIC vs. CGIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGIC
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
12.85%37.53%-2.81%
CGIE
Capital Group International Equity ETF
4.62%28.11%-3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CGIC and CGIE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

0.95

The correlation between CGIC and CGIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGIC vs. CGIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGIC
CGIE

Financial Services

20.2%
20.1%

Technology

16.7%
17.8%

Industrials

13.9%
28.1%

Basic Materials

8.8%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
2.7%

Communication Services

7.3%
2.2%

Energy

6.2%
3.8%

Healthcare

5.6%
7.5%

Utilities

4.1%
6.8%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Financial Services

CGIC
20.2%
CGIE
20.1%

Technology

CGIC
16.7%
CGIE
17.8%

Industrials

CGIC
13.9%
CGIE
28.1%

Basic Materials

CGIC
8.8%
CGIE
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

CGIC
8.1%
CGIE
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CGIC
7.4%
CGIE
2.7%

Communication Services

CGIC
7.3%
CGIE
2.2%

Energy

CGIC
6.2%
CGIE
3.8%

Healthcare

CGIC
5.6%
CGIE
7.5%

Utilities

CGIC
4.1%
CGIE
6.8%

Real Estate

CGIC
1.8%
CGIE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGIC vs. CGIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIC
CGIC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CGIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGIC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CGIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CGIE
CGIE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CGIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGIE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CGIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGIE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIC vs. CGIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) and Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGICCGIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.16

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

1.13

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.54

4.23

+6.31

CGIC vs. CGIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIC Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the CGIE Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIC and CGIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGICCGIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

0.84

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

1.06

+0.42

Drawdowns

CGIC vs. CGIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIC drawdown since its inception was -13.10%, smaller than the maximum CGIE drawdown of -13.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIC and CGIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGICCGIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.10%

-13.82%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-11.94%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.57%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-2.56%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.19%

-0.26%

Volatility

CGIC vs. CGIE - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Capital Group International Equity ETF (CGIE) at 5.31%. This indicates that CGIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGICCGIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

5.31%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

13.55%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.01%

16.03%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

15.52%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

15.52%

+0.62%

CGIC vs. CGIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CGIC and CGIE have an expense ratio of 0.54%.


Dividends

CGIC vs. CGIE - Dividend Comparison

CGIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than CGIE's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGIC
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
1.32%1.60%0.68%0.00%
CGIE
Capital Group International Equity ETF
1.11%1.17%1.27%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, CGIC and CGIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CGIC has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to CGIE (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIC dropped -13.10% vs CGIE's -13.82%.

On 1-year performance, CGIC leads with 30.79% vs 13.45% for CGIE. Both ETFs have the same 0.54% expense ratio. On volatility, CGIE has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGIC has performed better with a 30.79% return vs 13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGIC and CGIE have the same expense ratio: 0.54% per year.

CGIC has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 1.11% for CGIE.

CGIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGIC and CGIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer