PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGIAX vs. GFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGIAX vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGIAX achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than GFFFX's 9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CGIAX has underperformed GFFFX with an annualized return of 9.51%, while GFFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.12% annualized return.


CGIAX

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.62%
YTD
12.65%
6M
15.09%
1Y
28.70%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
9.51%

GFFFX

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.23%
YTD
9.30%
6M
8.82%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
25.07%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
16.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGIAX vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGIAX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund
12.65%35.04%3.26%15.22%-15.49%9.79%7.73%27.06%-14.45%26.00%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
9.30%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%38.16%28.43%-2.96%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CGIAX and GFFFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.78

The correlation between CGIAX and GFFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGIAX vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGIAX
CGIAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CGIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CGIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGIAX vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGIAXGFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.86

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

7.26

+2.95

CGIAX vs. GFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGIAX and GFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGIAXGFFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.68

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.61

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.82

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.81

-0.34

Drawdowns

CGIAX vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGIAX drawdown since its inception was -35.78%, roughly equal to the maximum GFFFX drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGIAX and GFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGIAXGFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.78%

-36.26%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-13.74%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

-21.55%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-36.26%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.78%

-36.26%

+0.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.12%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-5.57%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.51%

-0.62%

Volatility

CGIAX vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX) at 3.84%. This indicates that CGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGIAXGFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

3.84%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

11.66%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

15.17%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

20.25%

-5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.91%

19.69%

-3.78%

CGIAX vs. GFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGIAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGIAX vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison

CGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, less than GFFFX's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGIAX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund
7.32%8.13%3.34%2.27%3.99%6.90%1.35%2.36%2.74%1.80%2.29%3.17%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
10.02%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGIAX and GFFFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGIAX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to GFFFX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGIAX dropped -35.78% vs GFFFX's -36.26%.

CGIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGIAX and GFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer