PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGGR vs. USLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGGR vs. USLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGGR vs. USLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
-9.13%19.75%32.12%42.18%-18.50%
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
13.36%-9.59%188.91%64.34%20.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGR achieves a -9.13% return, which is significantly lower than USLM's 13.36% return.


CGGR

1D
-0.47%
1M
-5.05%
YTD
-9.13%
6M
-8.57%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
21.94%
5Y*
10Y*

USLM

1D
-0.11%
1M
8.90%
YTD
13.36%
6M
4.07%
1Y
46.20%
3Y*
64.02%
5Y*
38.36%
10Y*
29.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGGR vs. USLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGR
CGGR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CGGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGGR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CGGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGGR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

USLM
USLM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
USLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
USLM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
USLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
USLM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGR vs. USLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGGRUSLMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

1.21

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.15

1.79

-0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.18

-1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.07

5.90

-1.83

CGGR vs. USLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the USLM Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGR and USLM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGGRUSLMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.21

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.26

+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between CGGR and USLM is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CGGR vs. USLM - Dividend Comparison

CGGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than USLM's 0.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
0.10%0.10%0.33%0.40%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
0.18%0.20%0.15%0.35%0.57%0.50%0.56%6.52%0.76%0.70%0.66%0.91%

Drawdowns

CGGR vs. USLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGR drawdown since its inception was -28.90%, smaller than the maximum USLM drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGR and USLM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGGRUSLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.90%

-77.09%

+48.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-22.46%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.45%

-13.60%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-27.37%

+19.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

8.31%

-4.10%

Volatility

CGGR vs. USLM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is 7.11%, while United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) has a volatility of 12.59%. This indicates that CGGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGGRUSLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

12.59%

-5.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

26.79%

-13.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.65%

38.47%

-15.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

34.93%

-12.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

35.89%

-13.92%