PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGGR vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGGR vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGR achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.45% return.


CGGR

1D
1.08%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
2.92%
6M
3.25%
1Y
17.62%
3Y*
24.07%
5Y*
10Y*

LVHI

1D
0.37%
1M
0.77%
YTD
11.45%
6M
13.55%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGR vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
2.92%19.75%32.12%42.18%-18.50%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
11.45%27.12%14.81%17.45%4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGR and LVHI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.52

The correlation between CGGR and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CGGR vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGGR
LVHI

Technology

38.1%
0.1%

Communication Services

16.9%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
5.3%

Healthcare

9.3%
7.4%

Industrials

7.5%
13.4%

Financial Services

5.1%
23.6%

Basic Materials

2.3%
6.1%

Energy

2.1%
17.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
8.7%

Utilities

0.8%
10.4%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.9%

Technology

CGGR
38.1%
LVHI
0.1%

Communication Services

CGGR
16.9%
LVHI
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CGGR
13.1%
LVHI
5.3%

Healthcare

CGGR
9.3%
LVHI
7.4%

Industrials

CGGR
7.5%
LVHI
13.4%

Financial Services

CGGR
5.1%
LVHI
23.6%

Basic Materials

CGGR
2.3%
LVHI
6.1%

Energy

CGGR
2.1%
LVHI
17.4%

Consumer Defensive

CGGR
2.1%
LVHI
8.7%

Utilities

CGGR
0.8%
LVHI
10.4%

Real Estate

CGGR
0.8%
LVHI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGGR vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGGR
CGGR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CGGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGGR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CGGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGGR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGR vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGGRLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.58

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

4.84

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.29

19.99

-15.69

CGGR vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGGR Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGGR and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGGRLVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

3.10

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.81

-0.08

Drawdowns

CGGR vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGR drawdown since its inception was -28.90%, smaller than the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGR and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGGRLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.90%

-32.31%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-6.08%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-11.99%

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.19%

-1.79%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-3.52%

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

1.47%

+2.65%

Volatility

CGGR vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.35%. This indicates that CGGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGGRLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

2.35%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

7.58%

+5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

9.50%

+7.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.85%

11.07%

+10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

13.76%

+8.09%

CGGR vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGGR vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

CGGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than LVHI's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
0.09%0.10%0.33%0.40%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.79%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGGR and LVHI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGGR has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGGR dropped -28.90% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 3-year performance, CGGR leads with 24.07% vs 20.97% for LVHI. On fees, CGGR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGGR has performed better with a 24.07% return vs 20.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGGR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.09% for CGGR.

CGGR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGR and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGGR and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer