CGGG vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CGGG (Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CGGG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

CGGG vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CGGG

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGG vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	-1.30%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CGGG and GRW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	1.00

Return for Risk

CGGG vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGG	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	13.58	-12.81

Drawdowns

CGGG vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGG	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-0.45%	-17.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-0.27%	-1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-0.17%	-3.62%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGG	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.46%	8.89%	+8.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.46%	8.89%	+8.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	8.89%	+8.57%

CGGG vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGGG vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	0.07%	0.07%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGGG and GRW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, CGGG and GRW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CGGG or GRW?

On fees, CGGG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGGG or GRW?

CGGG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGGG or GRW?

CGGG has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between CGGG and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CGGG and 0.75% for GRW.