CGGG vs. ACSI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI).

CGGG and ACSI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGGG is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Jun 24, 2025. ACSI is a passively managed fund by Exponential ETFs that tracks the performance of the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2016.

Performance

CGGG vs. ACSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGGG vs. ACSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	-10.55%	10.45%
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	-3.00%	7.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGGG achieves a -10.55% return, which is significantly lower than ACSI's -3.00% return.

CGGG

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: -10.55%
• 6M: -10.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACSI

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -4.46%
• YTD: -3.00%
• 6M: -1.41%
• 1Y: 9.41%
• 3Y*: 14.35%
• 5Y*: 7.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGGG vs. ACSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGGG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ACSI's 0.66% expense ratio.

ACSI

American Customer Satisfaction ETF

CGGG

Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF

Return for Risk

CGGG vs. ACSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSI

ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 34
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 31
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGGG vs. ACSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF (CGGG) and American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGGG	ACSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.68	-0.77

Correlation

The correlation between CGGG and ACSI is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CGGG vs. ACSI - Dividend Comparison

CGGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than ACSI's 0.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CGGG Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF	0.08%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	0.94%	0.91%	0.69%	1.01%	0.81%	0.31%	0.82%	1.64%	1.59%	1.20%	0.18%

Drawdowns

CGGG vs. ACSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGGG drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum ACSI drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGGG and ACSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGGG	ACSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-34.49%	+16.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.78%	-5.38%	-8.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-5.47%	+1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGGG	ACSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.44%	15.66%	+1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.44%	16.65%	+0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.44%	17.49%	-0.05%