CGDV vs. VYMI
CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while VYMI is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. CGDV is actively managed, while VYMI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 24.27%/yr vs 20.99%/yr for VYMI. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGDV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VYMI.
Performance
CGDV vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CGDV having a 10.15% return and VYMI slightly lower at 10.04%.
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VYMI
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 20.99%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
CGDV vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 10.15% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 10.04% | 38.05% | 7.06% | 17.07% | -6.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGDV and VYMI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between CGDV and VYMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
CGDV vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGDV
VYMI
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
CGDV
VYMI
Industrials
CGDV
VYMI
Healthcare
CGDV
VYMI
Consumer Cyclical
CGDV
VYMI
Communication Services
CGDV
VYMI
Financial Services
CGDV
VYMI
Consumer Defensive
CGDV
VYMI
Energy
CGDV
VYMI
Basic Materials
CGDV
VYMI
Utilities
CGDV
VYMI
Real Estate
CGDV
VYMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGDV vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank
CGDV
VYMI
CGDV vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGDV | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.76 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.37 | 10.83 | +2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGDV | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.14 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.64 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
CGDV vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum VYMI drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and VYMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGDV | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -40.00% | +18.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -10.14% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -12.84% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -2.52% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -6.31% | +2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.58% | -0.51% |
Volatility
CGDV vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGDV | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 3.69% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 10.94% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 13.13% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 14.87% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 16.88% | -1.37% |
CGDV vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGDV vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison
CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than VYMI's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 3.48% | 3.68% | 4.84% | 4.58% | 4.70% | 4.30% | 3.22% | 4.20% | 4.29% | 3.21% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGDV and VYMI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VYMI has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to CGDV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs VYMI's -40.00%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.27% vs 20.99% for VYMI. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 20.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.
VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 1.19% for CGDV.
CGDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VYMI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGDV and 0.07% for VYMI.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGDV and VYMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer