PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGDV vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGDV vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.45% return.


CGDV

1D
0.13%
1M
1.46%
YTD
10.15%
6M
10.88%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
10Y*

LVHI

1D
0.37%
1M
0.77%
YTD
11.45%
6M
13.55%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDV vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
10.15%25.50%20.10%28.81%-2.89%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
11.45%27.12%14.81%17.45%4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and LVHI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.66

The correlation between CGDV and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CGDV vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CGDV
LVHI

Technology

34.1%
0.1%

Industrials

13.2%
13.4%

Healthcare

11.5%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
5.3%

Communication Services

8.4%
5.8%

Financial Services

6.8%
23.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
8.7%

Energy

3.8%
17.4%

Basic Materials

2.9%
6.1%

Utilities

2.1%
10.4%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.9%

Technology

CGDV
34.1%
LVHI
0.1%

Industrials

CGDV
13.2%
LVHI
13.4%

Healthcare

CGDV
11.5%
LVHI
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CGDV
10.6%
LVHI
5.3%

Communication Services

CGDV
8.4%
LVHI
5.8%

Financial Services

CGDV
6.8%
LVHI
23.6%

Consumer Defensive

CGDV
5.5%
LVHI
8.7%

Energy

CGDV
3.8%
LVHI
17.4%

Basic Materials

CGDV
2.9%
LVHI
6.1%

Utilities

CGDV
2.1%
LVHI
10.4%

Real Estate

CGDV
1.1%
LVHI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGDV vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDV vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGDVLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.58

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

4.84

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

19.99

-6.61

CGDV vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGDVLVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

3.10

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.81

+0.39

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGDVLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-32.31%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-6.08%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.28%

-11.99%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-1.79%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-3.52%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.47%

+0.60%

Volatility

CGDV vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.35%. This indicates that CGDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGDVLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.35%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

7.58%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

9.50%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

11.07%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

13.76%

+1.75%

CGDV vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGDV vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than LVHI's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.19%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.79%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGDV and LVHI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGDV has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.27% vs 20.97% for LVHI. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 20.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 1.19% for CGDV.

CGDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGDV and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGDV and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer