CGDV vs. DLN
CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. CGDV is actively managed, while DLN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 24.31%/yr vs 18.05%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGDV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
CGDV vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.74% return.
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 26.38%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
CGDV vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 11.43% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -0.44% |
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 9.74% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | 1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGDV and DLN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between CGDV and DLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CGDV vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CGDV
DLN
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
CGDV
DLN
Industrials
CGDV
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
CGDV
DLN
Healthcare
CGDV
DLN
Communication Services
CGDV
DLN
Financial Services
CGDV
DLN
Consumer Defensive
CGDV
DLN
Energy
CGDV
DLN
Basic Materials
CGDV
DLN
Real Estate
CGDV
DLN
Utilities
CGDV
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGDV vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
CGDV
DLN
CGDV vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGDV | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.41 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 3.37 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.64 | 14.09 | -1.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGDV vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGDV | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -57.84% | +36.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -6.10% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -13.71% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.31% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -7.50% | +3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.45% | +0.64% |
Volatility
CGDV vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.70%. This indicates that CGDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGDV | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 2.70% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 6.99% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 9.01% | +3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 13.26% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 16.14% | -0.57% |
CGDV vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGDV vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than DLN's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 1.80% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGDV and DLN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGDV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to DLN (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.31% vs 18.05% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.31% return vs 18.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.17% for CGDV.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGDV and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGDV and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer