CGDV vs. CGUS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) and CGUS (Capital Group Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while CGUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGDV returned 25.65%/yr vs 22.68%/yr for CGUS. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.33% expense ratio.

Performance

CGDV vs. CGUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than CGUS's 10.53% return.

CGDV

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 13.07%
• 1Y: 31.52%
• 3Y*: 25.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGUS

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 3.81%
• YTD: 10.53%
• 6M: 10.68%
• 1Y: 25.75%
• 3Y*: 22.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDV vs. CGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	12.65%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-2.89%
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	10.53%	16.21%	24.89%	27.72%	-7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and CGUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.95

The correlation between CGDV and CGUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

CGDV vs. CGUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CGDV	CGUS
Technology	34.1%	38.4%
Industrials	13.2%	9.6%
Healthcare	11.5%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	9.8%
Communication Services	8.4%	9.9%
Financial Services	6.8%	10.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	3.3%
Energy	3.8%	3.7%
Basic Materials	2.9%	2.5%
Utilities	2.1%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.1%	2.1%

Return for Risk

CGDV vs. CGUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 80
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 80

CGUS

CGUS Risk / Return Rank: 63
CGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
CGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDV vs. CGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGDV	CGUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.10	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	2.85	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.38	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	2.70	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.36	12.54	+2.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGDV vs. CGUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the CGUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and CGUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGDV	CGUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.10	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.98	+0.27

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. CGUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, roughly equal to the maximum CGUS drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and CGUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGDV	CGUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.82%	-21.86%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-9.59%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.28%	-18.06%	+3.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.20%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-4.64%	+1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.06%	0.00%

Volatility

CGDV vs. CGUS - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) at 2.90%. This indicates that CGDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGDV	CGUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	2.90%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.15%	9.47%	-0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	12.32%	-0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.48%	16.37%	-0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.48%	16.37%	-0.89%

CGDV vs. CGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CGDV and CGUS have an expense ratio of 0.33%.

Dividends

CGDV vs. CGUS - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than CGUS's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.16%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	0.87%	0.95%	1.02%	1.22%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGDV and CGUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CGDV and CGUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CGDV or CGUS?

CGDV has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to CGUS (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDV dropped -21.82% vs CGUS's -21.86%.

Which ETF is better, CGDV or CGUS?

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 25.65% vs 22.68% for CGUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.33% expense ratio. On volatility, CGUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGDV or CGUS?

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 25.65% return vs 22.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGDV or CGUS?

CGDV and CGUS have the same expense ratio: 0.33% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGDV or CGUS?

CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.87% for CGUS.

What is the main difference between CGDV and CGUS?

CGDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CGUS is Large Cap Blend Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.