PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGDG vs. FBNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGDG vs. FBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGDG vs. FBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
1.58%22.74%11.52%9.54%
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
-0.36%7.37%0.93%7.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDG achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than FBNDX's -0.36% return.


CGDG

1D
0.45%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
1.58%
6M
4.35%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBNDX

1D
0.14%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
0.36%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGDG vs. FBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDG has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FBNDX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGDG vs. FBNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDG
CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FBNDX
FBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDG vs. FBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGDGFBNDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

0.86

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

1.24

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.15

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.58

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.71

4.56

+4.15

CGDG vs. FBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the FBNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDG and FBNDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGDGFBNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

0.86

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.53

+0.98

Correlation

The correlation between CGDG and FBNDX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CGDG vs. FBNDX - Dividend Comparison

CGDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FBNDX's 3.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
1.94%1.95%2.15%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
3.58%3.87%3.34%3.56%1.98%1.34%4.70%2.75%2.86%2.18%2.72%2.66%

Drawdowns

CGDG vs. FBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDG drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, smaller than the maximum FBNDX drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDG and FBNDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGDGFBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-42.76%

+32.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-2.88%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.61%

-2.31%

-2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-10.37%

+9.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.00%

+1.19%

Volatility

CGDG vs. FBNDX - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) at 1.62%. This indicates that CGDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGDGFBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

1.62%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

2.74%

+5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.10%

4.62%

+9.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.22%

6.00%

+6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.22%

5.00%

+7.22%