PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGDG vs. CGUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGDG vs. CGUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDG achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly higher than CGUI's 1.50% return.


CGDG

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.00%
YTD
4.98%
6M
5.58%
1Y
15.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGUI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.84%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGDG vs. CGUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
4.98%22.74%5.42%
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
1.50%4.99%3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CGDG and CGUI is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGDG vs. CGUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDG
CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CGUI
CGUI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CGUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGUI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CGUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGUI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGDG vs. CGUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) and Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGDGCGUIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

5.99

-4.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

10.92

-8.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

2.66

-1.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

24.99

-22.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.88

105.06

-97.18

CGDG vs. CGUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the CGUI Sharpe Ratio of 5.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDG and CGUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGDGCGUIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

5.99

-4.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

6.20

-4.67

Drawdowns

CGDG vs. CGUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDG drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, which is greater than CGUI's maximum drawdown of -0.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDG and CGUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGDGCGUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.52%

-0.18%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-0.18%

-7.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-0.04%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-0.02%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

0.04%

+1.95%

Volatility

CGDG vs. CGUI - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF (CGUI) at 0.30%. This indicates that CGDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGDGCGUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

0.30%

+2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

0.56%

+7.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

0.74%

+9.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.16%

0.80%

+11.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.16%

0.80%

+11.36%

CGDG vs. CGUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDG has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than CGUI's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGDG vs. CGUI - Dividend Comparison

CGDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than CGUI's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGDG
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
1.88%1.95%2.15%0.39%
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
3.89%4.17%2.62%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGDG and CGUI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGDG has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to CGUI (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGDG dropped -10.52% vs CGUI's -0.18%.

On 1-year performance, CGDG leads with 15.66% vs 4.42% for CGUI. On fees, CGUI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CGUI has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGDG has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGUI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for CGDG.

CGUI has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 1.88% for CGDG.

CGDG is categorized as Global Equities, while CGUI is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for CGDG and 0.18% for CGUI.

CGUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.99 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGDG and CGUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer