CGCP vs. BNDP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP).

CGCP and BNDP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGCP is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022. BNDP is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2025.

Performance

CGCP vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGCP vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF	-0.21%	0.26%
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF	-0.19%	0.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGCP achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than BNDP's -0.19% return.

CGCP

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -1.69%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: 4.73%
• 3Y*: 4.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNDP

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -1.83%
• YTD: -0.19%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGCP vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGCP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio.

CGCP

Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF

BNDP

Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF

Return for Risk

CGCP vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGCP

CGCP Risk / Return Rank: 65
CGCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CGCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CGCP Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CGCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CGCP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGCP vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGCP	BNDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.00	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGCP	BNDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	-0.09	+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between CGCP and BNDP is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CGCP vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison

CGCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than BNDP's 0.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF	5.16%	5.10%	5.17%	4.98%	2.96%
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF	0.95%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CGCP vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGCP drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCP and BNDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGCP	BNDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.06%	-2.56%	-12.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-1.83%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-0.52%	-4.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGCP	BNDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.79%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.28%	3.66%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.44%	3.66%	+2.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.44%	3.66%	+2.78%