CGCB vs. VTG
CGCB (Capital Group Core Bond ETF) and VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. CGCB is actively managed, while VTG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGCB charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTG.
Performance
CGCB vs. VTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGCB achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's -0.11% return.
CGCB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTG
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -0.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGCB vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGCB Capital Group Core Bond ETF | 0.05% | 3.49% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | -0.11% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGCB and VTG is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGCB vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank
CGCB
VTG
CGCB vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGCB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGCB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.88 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
CGCB vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGCB drawdown since its inception was -5.17%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCB and VTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGCB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -2.89% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -1.89% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -0.73% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | — | — |
Volatility
CGCB vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGCB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94% | 3.51% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 3.51% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 3.51% | +1.88% |
CGCB vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGCB has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CGCB vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison
CGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than VTG's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CGCB Capital Group Core Bond ETF | 4.22% | 4.22% | 3.99% | 0.95% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 3.21% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, CGCB and VTG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CGCB.
CGCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 3.21% for VTG.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CGCB and 0.03% for VTG.
Find the right allocation for CGCB and VTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer