PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGCB vs. IBTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGCB vs. IBTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGCB vs. IBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
-0.07%7.29%1.44%6.80%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
-0.02%8.23%-0.87%6.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGCB achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than IBTO's -0.02% return.


CGCB

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
0.88%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBTO

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGCB vs. IBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGCB has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CGCB vs. IBTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGCB
CGCB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTO
IBTO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IBTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGCB vs. IBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGCBIBTODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

0.80

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

1.19

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.46

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.49

3.82

+0.68

CGCB vs. IBTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the IBTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGCB and IBTO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGCBIBTODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

0.80

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.48

+0.65

Correlation

The correlation between CGCB and IBTO is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGCB vs. IBTO - Dividend Comparison

CGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than IBTO's 4.10% yield.


TTM202520242023
CGCB
Capital Group Core Bond ETF
4.23%4.22%3.99%0.95%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
4.10%4.05%4.23%1.66%

Drawdowns

CGCB vs. IBTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGCB drawdown since its inception was -5.17%, smaller than the maximum IBTO drawdown of -8.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGCB and IBTO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGCBIBTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-8.36%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-3.08%

+0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-2.09%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-2.37%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

1.18%

-0.20%

Volatility

CGCB vs. IBTO - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) have volatilities of 1.73% and 1.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGCBIBTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

1.75%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

3.01%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57%

5.19%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.48%

6.74%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.48%

6.74%

-1.26%