CGB.DE vs. XESC.DE
CGB.DE (Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)) and XESC.DE (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - CGB.DE is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond 1-10 Years Capped Index, while XESC.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CGB.DE returned 2.48%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for XESC.DE. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGB.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XESC.DE.
Performance
CGB.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGB.DE achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than XESC.DE's 11.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CGB.DE has underperformed XESC.DE with an annualized return of 2.48%, while XESC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.
CGB.DE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- 11.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
XESC.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 22.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
CGB.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGB.DE Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.00% | -6.58% | 9.93% | -2.82% | -0.10% | 15.85% | -0.38% | 4.86% | 4.94% | -7.90% |
XESC.DE Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 11.96% | 22.24% | 11.06% | 22.50% | -8.87% | 23.54% | -2.88% | 30.09% | -12.09% | 10.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGB.DE and XESC.DE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015 | 0.03 |
The correlation between CGB.DE and XESC.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (5 years) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGB.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CGB.DE
XESC.DE
CGB.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGB.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 2.04 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.91 | 7.10 | +4.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGB.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGB.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum XESC.DE drawdown of -46.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGB.DE and XESC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGB.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.06% | -46.74% | +26.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -10.88% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.08% | -16.53% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.94% | -23.33% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.64% | -38.51% | +23.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | 0.00% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -9.05% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 3.13% | -2.17% |
Volatility
CGB.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE) is 1.70%, while Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that CGB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XESC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGB.DE | XESC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 3.86% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.01% | 13.34% | -9.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.81% | 16.07% | -10.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.74% | 17.58% | -10.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 17.93% | -6.87% |
CGB.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGB.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CGB.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison
CGB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while XESC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGB.DE Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.00% | 2.40% | 2.37% | 2.97% | 4.40% | 2.17% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 0.72% | 2.64% | 0.38% |
XESC.DE Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGB.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CGB.DE.
CGB.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. CGB.DE tracks FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond 1-10 Years Capped Index, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CGB.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.
Find the right allocation for CGB.DE and XESC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer