PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGAU vs. FHYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGAU vs. FHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) and Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGAU achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly higher than FHYS's 1.67% return.


CGAU

1D
-3.12%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
8.63%
6M
4.70%
1Y
123.87%
3Y*
42.55%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*

FHYS

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.63%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
7.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGAU vs. FHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
8.63%159.49%-1.45%19.37%-32.55%8.94%
FHYS
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF
1.67%7.72%7.23%10.88%-7.31%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CGAU and FHYS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGAU vs. FHYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGAU
CGAU Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CGAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CGAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGAU Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FHYS
FHYS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGAU vs. FHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) and Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGAUFHYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

3.44

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

17.64

-5.79

CGAU vs. FHYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGAU Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FHYS Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGAU and FHYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGAU vs. FHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGAU drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, which is greater than FHYS's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGAU and FHYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGAUFHYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.47%

-11.62%

-51.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.50%

-1.66%

-27.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.24%

-3.16%

-27.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.77%

-0.10%

-25.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.55%

-2.26%

-27.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.49%

0.32%

+10.17%

Volatility

CGAU vs. FHYS - Volatility Comparison

Centerra Gold Inc (CGAU) has a higher volatility of 19.02% compared to Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) at 0.63%. This indicates that CGAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGAUFHYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.02%

0.63%

+18.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.99%

2.20%

+40.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.29%

2.68%

+49.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.12%

4.92%

+42.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.86%

4.92%

+43.94%

Dividends

CGAU vs. FHYS - Dividend Comparison

CGAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than FHYS's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CGAU
Centerra Gold Inc
1.31%1.39%3.59%3.45%0.00%0.00%
FHYS
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF
5.76%5.96%6.42%6.76%6.25%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGAU and FHYS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGAU has higher volatility (19.02%) compared to FHYS (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGAU dropped -63.47% vs FHYS's -11.62%.

CGAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGAU and FHYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer