PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CG1G.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CG1G.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CG1G.DE achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZA.DE's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, CG1G.DE has underperformed H4ZA.DE with an annualized return of 8.99%, while H4ZA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.03% annualized return.


CG1G.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-2.28%
YTD
0.85%
1Y
1.41%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
8.99%

H4ZA.DE

1D
-0.80%
1M
-0.88%
6M
5.52%
YTD
9.79%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CG1G.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CG1G.DE
Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc)
0.85%22.68%18.23%19.47%-12.77%15.19%3.12%24.73%-18.14%12.10%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
9.79%22.26%11.06%22.59%-8.87%23.72%-2.73%30.04%-11.95%10.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CG1G.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010

0.91

The correlation between CG1G.DE and H4ZA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CG1G.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CG1G.DE
CG1G.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CG1G.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CG1G.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CG1G.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CG1G.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CG1G.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CG1G.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CG1G.DEH4ZA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.22

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

1.72

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.36

6.00

-5.64

CG1G.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CG1G.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CG1G.DE and H4ZA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CG1G.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CG1G.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.41%, roughly equal to the maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown of -38.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CG1G.DE and H4ZA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CG1G.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.41%

-38.40%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-10.97%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.88%

-16.39%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.68%

-23.26%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.41%

-38.40%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-2.69%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-7.18%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

3.14%

+0.79%

Volatility

CG1G.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) at 3.98%. This indicates that CG1G.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H4ZA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CG1G.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

3.98%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.56%

13.35%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

16.04%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

17.53%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

17.81%

+0.21%

CG1G.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CG1G.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CG1G.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison

CG1G.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CG1G.DE
Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.38%2.49%2.89%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


CG1G.DE and H4ZA.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CG1G.DE.

CG1G.DE tracks DAX Index, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CG1G.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CG1G.DE and H4ZA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer