CG1G.DE vs. XB4A.DE
CG1G.DE (Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc)) and XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - CG1G.DE tracks the DAX Index while XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CG1G.DE returned 9.92%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for XB4A.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CG1G.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XB4A.DE.
Performance
CG1G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CG1G.DE achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 26.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CG1G.DE has underperformed XB4A.DE with an annualized return of 9.92%, while XB4A.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.98% annualized return.
CG1G.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 25.41%
- YTD
- 26.47%
- 1Y
- 51.75%
- 3Y*
- 31.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
CG1G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CG1G.DE Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) | 4.76% | 22.68% | 18.23% | 19.47% | -12.77% | 15.19% | 3.12% | 24.73% | -18.14% | 12.10% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 26.47% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 32.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between CG1G.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011 | 0.70 |
The correlation between CG1G.DE and XB4A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CG1G.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CG1G.DE
XB4A.DE
CG1G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CG1G.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.50 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 4.73 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 16.12 | -14.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CG1G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CG1G.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.41%, smaller than the maximum XB4A.DE drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CG1G.DE and XB4A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CG1G.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.41% | -53.54% | +15.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -10.88% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.88% | -16.26% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.68% | -32.50% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.41% | -53.54% | +15.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.54% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -9.90% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 3.20% | +0.78% |
Volatility
CG1G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) is 4.39%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that CG1G.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CG1G.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 6.08% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 14.73% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.30% | 17.53% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 19.15% | -1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 20.21% | -2.17% |
CG1G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CG1G.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CG1G.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CG1G.DE nor XB4A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CG1G.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CG1G.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CG1G.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
CG1G.DE tracks DAX Index, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CG1G.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
Find the right allocation for CG1G.DE and XB4A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer